Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Cornish > Re: More ***bri...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 26 of 55 Topic 142 of 238
Post > Topic >>

Re: More ***bric Grammar

by "hawker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <flink@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 19, 2005 at 09:00 PM

"allan connochie" <allan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:432be3a2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bob and Doris Jones" <bobianjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:s3LWe.49548$FA3.41768@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> hawker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>
>> > ... I am publi****ng it as I go along so there will be a need for
>> > constant updates.
> IMHO the huge percentage of red-haired people
>> in Brigantia is a direct genetic legacy of the Picts (the highest
>> percentage of anywhere in the world).


Allan, whoever published this article was greatly mistaken. In fact there
is 
an undeniable Gwyddelic contribution to the gene pool in Brigantia.
Gwyddel 
not in the sense of Irish, but in the sense of the pre-Beaker people 
population of Neolythic farmers. The Gwyddels were almost as old as the 
Picts and the Iberians, but they were neither Picts nor Iberians.The so 
called "red haired" people is an old "red herring" that goes back to the 
18th. century antiquarians.It is just rubbish.There is no evidence of a 
Pictish population outside Scotland.
>
> Fairytale stuff.  The various Pictish kingdoms were north of the
> Forth/Antonine/Clyde line.  The land of the Brigantes was way to the
south
> in northern England.  Seperating them were the Brittonic tribes of the
> Southern Uplands and central Scotland, some of whom 'may' have been more
> closely connected to the Brigantes in pre-Roman tribes. The later
northern
> British kingdoms, especially in the west, certainly traversed what is
now
> the Scottish/English border, but these kingdoms were Brittonic units and

> had
> nothing to do with any Pictish expansion.  No such southerly expansion
> happened perhaps apart from in the Firth of Forth area.  The attacks 
> during
> the Barbarian Conspiracy by Scots and Picts in the area in question were
> just massive raids and not conquests of territory. There was probably
> little, if any, significant genetic difference between the Brigantes and
> Pictish peoples.  The Picts only emerged from the northern British
tribes
> who remained outwith the Roman Empire. If however you are right and red
> haired people in the land of the Brigantes are descended from people who
> lived in, what is now parts of Scotland, then it's much more likely that
> they are a product of folk movement during the Industrial Revolution and
> after.
>
>
> Allan
>
>
 




 55 Posts in Topic:
More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <fl  2005-09-05 18:07:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
micheil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 16:54:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-10 12:14:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:50:35 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-17 02:20:08 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-17 07:48:08 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-17 13:38:35 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:03:13 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 11:52:33 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 13:22:50 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-19 23:45:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-20 07:08:56 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 11:52:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 06:59:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Angof" <ang  2005-09-22 09:43:41 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-22 10:33:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:04:20 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
michael lightfoot <mic  2005-09-21 00:18:06 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 21:28:14 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:13:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 15:48:17 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:20:14 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-25 10:41:41 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <fl  2005-09-29 21:59:52 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-30 00:02:36 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:00:56 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-19 23:34:26 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-20 07:08:48 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 11:53:42 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:18:26 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-21 23:42:02 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:21:46 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-25 09:59:12 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-30 07:54:09 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
axel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-09-30 10:10:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:51:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"R.Peffers." &l  2006-05-27 19:31:06 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Custos Custodum <me@[E  2005-09-30 15:25:34 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:53:21 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
axel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-09-30 10:10:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Custos Custodum <me@[E  2005-09-30 15:25:34 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:11:16 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:38:33 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:30:55 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-25 09:07:18 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 20:50:53 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:36:00 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-18 05:51:20 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:06:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-11 09:13:28 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:52:55 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 22:33:22 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-14 11:42:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-14 22:40:26 
HTMK test
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:28:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 10:01:45 CDT 2008.