Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Cornish > Re: More ***bri...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 43 of 55 Topic 142 of 242
Post > Topic >>

Re: More ***bric Grammar

by Bob and Doris Jones <bobianjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 20, 2005 at 12:38 PM

Bob and Doris Jones wrote:
> hawker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> 
>> "allan connochie" <allan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:432be3a2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> "Bob and Doris Jones" <bobianjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:s3LWe.49548$FA3.41768@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> hawker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ... I am publi****ng it as I go along so there will be a need for
>>>>> constant updates.
>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO the huge percentage of red-haired people
>>>
>>>> in Brigantia is a direct genetic legacy of the Picts (the highest
>>>> percentage of anywhere in the world).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Allan, whoever published this article was greatly mistaken. In fact 
>> there is an undeniable Gwyddelic contribution to the gene pool in 
>> Brigantia. Gwyddel not in the sense of Irish, but in the sense of the 
>> pre-Beaker people population of Neolythic farmers. The Gwyddels were 
>> almost as old as the Picts and the Iberians, but they were neither 
>> Picts nor Iberians.The so called "red haired" people is an old "red 
>> herring" that goes back to the 18th. century antiquarians.It is just 
>> rubbish.There is no evidence of a Pictish population outside Scotland.
> 
> 
> Were the Gwyddel reputed to be predominantly red-haired like the 
> Caledonians (Picts) ? If this is so, ther may be a tie-up here.

Gwyddel refers to Gaelic settlers in Cymru.
> 
>>
>>> Fairytale stuff.  The various Pictish kingdoms were north of the
>>> Forth/Antonine/Clyde line.  The land of the Brigantes was way to the 
>>> south
>>> in northern England.  Seperating them were the Brittonic tribes of the
>>> Southern Uplands and central Scotland, some of whom 'may' have been
more
>>> closely connected to the Brigantes in pre-Roman tribes. The later 
>>> northern
>>> British kingdoms, especially in the west, certainly traversed what is 
>>> now
>>> the Scottish/English border, but these kingdoms were Brittonic units 
>>> and had
>>> nothing to do with any Pictish expansion.  No such southerly expansion
>>> happened perhaps apart from in the Firth of Forth area.  The attacks 
>>> during
>>> the Barbarian Conspiracy by Scots and Picts in the area in question
were
>>> just massive raids and not conquests of territory. There was probably
>>> little, if any, significant genetic difference between the Brigantes
and
>>> Pictish peoples.  The Picts only emerged from the northern British 
>>> tribes
>>> who remained outwith the Roman Empire. If however you are right and
red
>>> haired people in the land of the Brigantes are descended from people
who
>>> lived in, what is now parts of Scotland, then it's much more likely
that
>>> they are a product of folk movement during the Industrial Revolution
and
>>> after.
>>>
>>>
>>> Allan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
 




 55 Posts in Topic:
More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <fl  2005-09-05 18:07:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
micheil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 16:54:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-10 12:14:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:50:35 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-17 02:20:08 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-17 07:48:08 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-17 13:38:35 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:03:13 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 11:52:33 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 13:22:50 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-19 23:45:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-20 07:08:56 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 11:52:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 06:59:49 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Angof" <ang  2005-09-22 09:43:41 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-22 10:33:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:04:20 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
michael lightfoot <mic  2005-09-21 00:18:06 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 21:28:14 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:13:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 15:48:17 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:20:14 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-25 10:41:41 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <fl  2005-09-29 21:59:52 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-30 00:02:36 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:00:56 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-19 23:34:26 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-20 07:08:48 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-20 11:53:42 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:18:26 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-21 23:42:02 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:21:46 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"allan connochie&quo  2005-09-25 09:59:12 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-30 07:54:09 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
axel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-09-30 10:10:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:51:10 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"R.Peffers." &l  2006-05-27 19:31:06 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Custos Custodum <me@[E  2005-09-30 15:25:34 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:53:21 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
axel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-09-30 10:10:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Custos Custodum <me@[E  2005-09-30 15:25:34 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:11:16 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-20 12:38:33 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-22 07:30:55 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
Bob and Doris Jones <b  2005-09-25 09:07:18 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 20:50:53 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"Hawker" <ha  2006-05-18 16:36:00 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-18 05:51:20 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-19 21:06:27 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-11 09:13:28 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:52:55 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 22:33:22 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"moi" <moi@[  2005-09-14 11:42:29 
Re: More Cumbric Grammar
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-14 22:40:26 
HTMK test
"hawker@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-09-13 07:28:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 16:42:07 CST 2008.