Re: History of the Breton Language

Michilín wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:37:08 GMT, John
> <guinnog@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Michilín wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:25:29 GMT, John
>>><guinnog@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Michilín" <micheil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4358fce8.4716862@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Posters can use Gaelic and Scots according to the group charter -
>>>>>>English is available for those who would prefer to be English,
usually
>>>>>>referred to as Britclones in this group. People like you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And me apparently.
>>>>>
>>>>>A W-S
>>>>
>>>>And me. Gaelic is less spoken in Scotland than some Asian languages. 
>>>>Worldwide, less than Esperanto.
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>><rolling eyes> Felt you had to get your name in print, did you?
>>
>>You are right. At least I only use the one though, eh?
>>
>>John
> 
> 
> Well, not all of us are blessed with imagination. I think John sounds
> very, how should I put it, reassuring, giving a picture of a lad who
> may not be overly bright but who is determined to do his best. 

Gosh! What a wonderful imagination you must have. I'll pass on your 
perceptions of my given name next time I speak to my mother, who chose 
it, if I remember to.

'Michilin' sounds so much more *ethnic* than Michael, doesn't it? Maybe 
I'll make up a more interesting posting name. The more I think about it, 
the more I think you are right and that 'John' is a dead boring name to 
post under compared to yours.

John