Re: Breton, Cornish & French

Chess One wrote:
> John, 3 minutes after my note to Renia, you write in to rubbish the
> content of the message.

No, Chess, *you* rubbished the content!

> There are a couple of reasons why people do that on usenet - you feel
> threatened, is the first and very /obvious/ reason, and the second is
> that you like to create tensions among others since you get off on it
> <-- also equally evident!

Actually, insanity *does* make me feel uncomfortable.

> OK?
>
> Indeed, in your own words below you do not have the faintest clue
> what I am talking, so perhaps reserve your comment? Otherwise your
> abused 'virgin persona' will forever exclaim on all you do /not/
> understand or have any experience of, rather than join with others to
> discuss what they /do/ understand.

No, it was an invitation for you to explain yourself.

> I simply wish Renia to understand something about the nature of
> inquiry. Its a process thing. That is what I am writing about. I do
> not insist Renia agrees with me on any issue, since I am hardly
> stating any 'issue' or result of inquiry, but how we go about
> acquiring inofrmation.

Well, Renia can speak for herself, but the rest of us are more interested
in 
content, results and information than in "process".

> I cannot proceed further if these messages are intercepted by people
> who do not wish any mutual understanding to occur. Which, sadly, is
> all too typical newsgroup fare, and must discourage those who would
> actually like to share their processes and explorations.

"Processes" and "explorations" are futile if they do not result in 
knowledge.
-- 
John Briggs