Uncomprehensible! was Re: Breton, Cornish & French

"Robert Peffers" <peffers50@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:LaKdnWs0Z9Gga1TanZ2dnUVZ8q2dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> In other words, you confound your Mote with your Mottel [Old French].
>>>
>>> Just the faintest clue as to what you are talking about?
>>
>> I mentioend to Renia a while back that this poster does this. His posts

>> go all uncomprehensible. I don't know whether he's taking the piss and 
>> trying to make people feel dim because they can't follow him, or is he 
>> genuinely trying to communicate. I suspect it's the former but who
knows 
>> :-)
>>
>> Allan
>>
>
> Well, Allan, I think, perhaps, that you know.

Well, you 2 wags, I wonder if you can get over jerking each other off, and

try a topic? That would be a test wouldn't it? Or is that too 
"uncomprehensible"?

You must consider a couple or three things in your response, that (a) 
"uncomprehensible" may well mean that the nominal topic is 
*in*comprehensible to /you/, and (b) that that is not my fault, since 
indeed, anyone who can write "uncomprehensible" has a bunch of explaining
to 
do themselves about their own "uncomprehension", and (c) that calling 
someone "uncomprehensible" is illiterate.

You excuse my jollity at your reposts, which are not quite as to challenge

any actual /point/ specifically, and which might be better termed
'blunts'.

Cordially, Phil Innes