Re: Breton, Cornish & French

Chess One wrote:
> "John Briggs" <john.briggs4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:PBhyj.24723$%W6.10009@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Chess One wrote:
>
>>> When I have asked people here they have become [mildly] abusive,
>>> dismissive, vague and evasive! Yet ontology has to do with the
>>> nature of things, including our investigation of them. It is not an
>>> attack or challenge to any particular knowledge, as much as to
>>> *****s the means we come to resolve on the process of investigation.
>>
>> Ontology?  Make up your mind: you were wittering about
>> "epistemology" a while back.
>
> A while back I may have used that term in context to the difference
> between this and another approach. Did you have some point to make on
> the /topic/ of the post to which you refer, or the mtehod of inquiry,
> or are you noticing 2 different terms that you personally cannot
> distinguish between?
> Come on John! You pretend to very much here, your opinions are v .. a
> .. s .. t,  and your own expression is O! so vague!
>
> For the pedants among us, including self, ontological expression
> contains a measure of metaphysical admittion, [that is to say, of
> Ideas, which one does not own as one's own] whereas epistemology
> concerns the nature [or observation] of nature iteslf.

Not many of us are going to agree with that.
-- 
John Briggs