Re: Breton, Cornish & French

You think I am a poseur, Renia? A rentier-intellectual upon Celtic themes?

How will you ever diiferentiate that from anything more substantial, given

your own penchant to not address topic, but rather suppose on another's 
attitude? What you 'suspect' Pfaw! That is about you, Madam. Your 
suspicions.

And how come should you write with these stalking dorks who propose
nothing 
at all for 30 posts on any topic? Yet you would prefer that posturing to 
content, despite your academic degree, modest though it is?

What you suspect Madam, is of your own psyche, and in arguing some 
abstraction which you cannot otherwse win, except you outlast the patience

of those who would address content: And so, few of any worth write here.

You will admit that you argue no content in your message below? And that
you 
seek social encouragement for no content postings?

pfft!

What utter nonsense you all propose to each other!

If you wish to engage any topic you should at minimum mention what it is, 
otherwise you are undifferentiated from net-trash who need no topic to do 
their thing, which is to **** over those who know aught.

Think on that, and think also why /you/ speculate negatively on others.
Why 
is that?

Any nominal topic here is so depressed by personality scandal-merchants as

to inhibit any considerable expression of it.

You are voting with your words for the crudest level of net-volk, Madam, 
which is inherently fascist, and O! so English!

These are Celtic newsgroups, Madam, and for true Celts we petition:-

    Sign me from the spells
    Sign me from the charms

Carmina Gadelica

Phil Innes

"Renia" <renia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fqcovi$ma0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Briggs wrote:
>> allan connochie wrote:
>>> "John Briggs" <john.briggs4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:Lvhyj.26491$oW4.14120@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Chess One wrote:
>>>>> "Renia" <renia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fpnm8l$u2m$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> you have not yet demonstrated
>>>>> your ability to express yourself by other then general [and
>>>>> negative] aspersions.
>>>>> And when people are unable to adequately express themselves, how
>>>>> then to engage their vagueness - which they are happy to project
>>>>> outward as the convulutions of others?
>>>> convolutions?
>>>>
>>>>> In other words, you confound your Mote with your Mottel [Old
>>>>> French].
>>>> Just the faintest clue as to what you are talking about?
>>> I mentioend to Renia a while back that this poster does this. His
>>> posts go all uncomprehensible. I don't know whether he's taking the
>>> piss and trying to make people feel dim because they can't follow
>>> him, or is he genuinely trying to communicate. I suspect it's the
>>> former but who knows :-)
>>
>> He's not genuinely trying to communicate, but on the other hand he's
not 
>> doing it deliberately.  I think his incoherence is genuine, 
>> unfortunately. He's trying to impress but confusing himself.  He's an 
>> autodidact - with all the drawbacks, but none of the advantages.
>
> I suspect he thinks he is writing beautifully-composed English. Quite 
> possibly, he is one of those people who believes if he uses long words
and 
> complicated syntax, that he will sound super-smart and intellectually 
> intimidating. Unfortunate, because he may well have something to say, if

> only he would say it plainly.