Re: Breton, Cornish & French

"Renia" <renia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fvlcv4$76c$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chess One wrote:
>> You think I am a poseur, Renia? A rentier-intellectual upon Celtic 
>> themes?
>
>
> As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

You have trouble with which words? You have trouble saying which?

> If English is your native tongue, then you have an appalling writing
style 
> and should stick to your day job.

Thank you, renia, for your gratuititous and completely insincere advice,
and 
for the mere suggestion that you yourself could attempt a subject by such 
means, but demonstrably have said nothing to any topic for 5 months.

It is entirely appaling that there are merely a couple dozen posts here in
a 
month, since I last looked. It will not occur to you that you have
anything 
to do with that.

Just see below the contextual basis for a conversation, and your pissy 
response. ****! You are hardly different than the 'men'.  [ROFL]

I do not see any need to say again what I have written below - or to refer

you to the necessity of actually addressing a subject in your responses,
to 
differentiate yourself from a callow sort of person.

    CONTEXT?

I seem to remember our first writing when I suggested that the 'saets' or 
sets, as in Somerset and Dorser, was phonetically same to the '***' suffix

in the home counties, and that these words were merely differently spelled

versions of the same thing.

I never noticed any substantive response you made to this comment - nor
any 
other substantive comment you have made. In fact for someone so proud of 
their English, what have you expressed yourself, except pissy avoidance of

demonstrating it?  ;)

It is unlikely you will appreciate quite what I am saying, since it is the

most common usenet abuse to say that what anyone doesn't like, is what
they 
don't understand, and the fault of others. That is to say, you will 
understand it, but not admit it.

There you are! If there is something you have to say about a topic, say
it! 
Otherwise don't prance about with your postures!

Please do not pretend to some knowledge you demonstrably fail to address! 
[10 times?] What idiocy you insist upon in order to deploy your
suggestions 
of your own [reserved] knowledge ani very great grandueur!

You, like the 'men' are hardly worth putting down. You have no content,
and 
exhault in that.

Phil Innes

> P.S. Not all the groups you are posting to are Celtic ones.
>
> P.P.S. I am not English.


PPPPS: Do you mean me to chase your coy commentary? You are not
sufficiently 
interesting - in fact you have said nothing at all to any topic.




>
>>
>> How will you ever diiferentiate that from anything more substantial, 
>> given your own penchant to not address topic, but rather suppose on 
>> another's attitude? What you 'suspect' Pfaw! That is about you, Madam. 
>> Your suspicions.
>>
>> And how come should you write with these stalking dorks who propose 
>> nothing at all for 30 posts on any topic? Yet you would prefer that 
>> posturing to content, despite your academic degree, modest though it
is?
>>
>> What you suspect Madam, is of your own psyche, and in arguing some 
>> abstraction which you cannot otherwse win, except you outlast the 
>> patience of those who would address content: And so, few of any worth 
>> write here.
>>
>> You will admit that you argue no content in your message below? And
that 
>> you seek social encouragement for no content postings?
>>
>> pfft!
>>
>> What utter nonsense you all propose to each other!
>>
>> If you wish to engage any topic you should at minimum mention what it
is, 
>> otherwise you are undifferentiated from net-trash who need no topic to
do 
>> their thing, which is to **** over those who know aught.
>>
>> Think on that, and think also why /you/ speculate negatively on others.

>> Why is that?
>>
>> Any nominal topic here is so depressed by personality scandal-merchants

>> as to inhibit any considerable expression of it.
>>
>> You are voting with your words for the crudest level of net-volk,
Madam, 
>> which is inherently fascist, and O! so English!
>>
>> These are Celtic newsgroups, Madam, and for true Celts we petition:-
>>
>>     Sign me from the spells
>>     Sign me from the charms
>>
>> Carmina Gadelica
>>
>> Phil Innes
>>
>> "Renia" <renia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:fqcovi$ma0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> John Briggs wrote:
>>>> allan connochie wrote:
>>>>> "John Briggs" <john.briggs4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Lvhyj.26491$oW4.14120@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Chess One wrote:
>>>>>>> "Renia" <renia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:fpnm8l$u2m$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> you have not yet demonstrated
>>>>>>> your ability to express yourself by other then general [and
>>>>>>> negative] aspersions.
>>>>>>> And when people are unable to adequately express themselves, how
>>>>>>> then to engage their vagueness - which they are happy to project
>>>>>>> outward as the convulutions of others?
>>>>>> convolutions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, you confound your Mote with your Mottel [Old
>>>>>>> French].
>>>>>> Just the faintest clue as to what you are talking about?
>>>>> I mentioend to Renia a while back that this poster does this. His
>>>>> posts go all uncomprehensible. I don't know whether he's taking the
>>>>> piss and trying to make people feel dim because they can't follow
>>>>> him, or is he genuinely trying to communicate. I suspect it's the
>>>>> former but who knows :-)
>>>> He's not genuinely trying to communicate, but on the other hand he's 
>>>> not doing it deliberately.  I think his incoherence is genuine, 
>>>> unfortunately. He's trying to impress but confusing himself.  He's an

>>>> autodidact - with all the drawbacks, but none of the advantages.
>>> I suspect he thinks he is writing beautifully-composed English. Quite 
>>> possibly, he is one of those people who believes if he uses long words

>>> and complicated syntax, that he will sound super-smart and 
>>> intellectually intimidating. Unfortunate, because he may well have 
>>> something to say, if only he would say it plainly.
>>