I am MI5 and I am still watching YOU!
We have a list of secret agents, we are all watching you
BitterAnklo = Japan agent in Osaka
lt Lee - CCP PLA type from China and North Carolina
BaldEagle - Hawaii office to Singa****e
Supertech= Korea to Texas field office
Abian Chen= Taiwan to NY
L. Alpert = Jewish plant/ in CT.
Susan Cohen our head UK MI5 office head.
YES we are all watching YOU!
<efmvf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:ij0711260839519621@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999
>
> If You Intend To Reply, Please Read. This
> Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a. page or two
will
> be deleted without being. read.
>
> BBC newscaster Nicholas. Witchell cant stop himself laughing
>
> During 1990-91. there were very many instances of "interactive
> television" where newscasters and other TV presenters saw on. a screen
> before them what was happening. in my home, and reacted, frequently by
> laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately did. not record these
> programmes. For. the last year or two, I have been recording everything
I
> watch, and there has been a drastic decrease in. such incidents.
>
> However, on occasion, television. presenters do still engage in
> "interactive watching" and react to. what they see. This has been
evident
> with Jon Snow of Channel Four News. recently - a particularly
interesting
> case, since it. has been established that he cannot be corrupted by
money
> (it is well-do***ented that MI5 offered. him a tax-free salary and he
> turned them down). I wonder. what device MI5 are using to encourage him
to
> do the "interactive. watching"?
>
> On Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2. News
reacted
> when he saw that I was watching the programme, and. I have his reactions
> stored safely on videotape. I. have watched this tape several times and
I
> am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions. is correct.
For
> several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he. attempted to keep
a
> straight face. Then finally his self-control. eva****ated through the
> excuse
> of a weak joke and. his face collapsed into a grin.
>
> The strange thing is that I dont know why. he was laughing at me, what I
> had done recently to "deserve" to be laughed at.. The MI5 persecutors
> usually manage. to invent some justification as to why people should
laugh
> at. and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell
> could have been laughing for any. number of reasons. Perhaps he found
the
> views I have been expressing in these. articles amusing? I suppose if
> youre
> paid enough money and. ordered to laugh then even the most innocuous
thing
> becomes. funny.
>
> Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop himself smirking,. either.
>
> On 12 February. 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon
> Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if anything. out
of
> the. ordinary happened, Id be able to go back and watch it again.
>
> Now,. Jon Snow, by his own claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned
down
> an offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to.
make
> him their mouthpiece, and he told them where. to get off.
>
> So you will be most surprised to learn that. Jon Snow "interactively
> watched" me. that evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately
> fifteen. minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President
> would be making a. live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the
clock
> on. the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly
> tried to. suppress a smirk.
>
> Uncorruptible, are you, Mister. Snow? If not money, then why are you
> watching me, Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant. you
turn
> the. monitor off, Mister Snow?
>
> Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham),. my elected representative, as ever
> refuses. to help.
>
> Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German. "Final Solution"
>
> It might. seem offensive to compare the mass murder of millions of
> civilians in wartime. with the peacetime persecution of merely one
> person. Yet the comparison has been coursing through my mind for.
several
> years now, because the. brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is
very
> much comparable to the brutality of British intent to. someone they
> vituperate. and term "not up to British standards". The methods may
> differ,
> but the persecutors. mindset is the same.
>
> The Germans first targeted. the mentally disabled, too
>
> During WW2 millions of ethnic. Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill,
> gypsies
> and other minorities were rounded up. and murdered in purpose-built
camps
> by the German. regime, in the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years
> on,
> the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a. campaign of mass
> hysteria; but in their cowardice,. limited their activities to one
single
> victim.
>
> It is. instructive to note that the early German "cleansing" effort was
> directed primarily not at Jews,. but at the mentally ill. The Nazis set
up
> the T4 project in the thirties to "cleanse" away. 70,000 mentally
disabled
> people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2. the Jews
with
> their media influence used the reaction from the holocaust. to roll back
> anti-semitism in the Western countries; however, the mentally. ill are
> today still a persecuted group in the modern. Western world as they were
> under the Nazis (the current. Jewish home secretary in the UK intends to
> bring in laws for incarceration without. any criminal charge for some
> mentally ill people - he protects his. own minority, but does nothing
for
> the other minorities in. todays society), and this continuing bias forms
a
> central. cause for the current acts of persecution in the UK.
>
> Widespread knowledge of what is happening to the "un-British". minority
>
> In both the German persecution of the. thirties and early forties, and
the
> current British persecution, many, many people are well aware of. whats
> happening. There is widespread complicity through. inaction of
> populace; and in a substantial pro****tion of the mainstread. population,
> the persecution had/has widespread. enthusiastic sup****t; yet in both
the
> German case in the 1940s and the British. today, the existence of
> persecution is a mass secret which must be never. admitted out loud. In
> the
> recent Lawrence. case this "secret bigotry" has been termed
> "institutionalised racism",. and that is a very good word for what the
> British are doing today The persecutory attitudes and omerta. regarding
> them are so deeply ingrained. in the national psyche that they define
the
> national. mood
>
> During. WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing, and through
> inaction. quietly condoned their government's mass murder of
> "un-German". minorities and inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s,
> similarly, many English people. know what the MI5 British Secret Police
> have been doing, and not only condone. it, but actively take part,
because
> of xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that is. the target
> of
> "British" actions. This. attitude by the British persecutors has been
made
> explicit through the words "he's not up to. British standards"; the
> British
> seem. to have found their very own "untermenschen" to victimise.
>
> Why these obsessive "holy wars". happen
>
> This type of. aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or
> humiliated in some way, economically,. militarily or culturally. In
> pre-WW2
> Germany the threat was primarily economic and. military, following
> Germany's humiliating defeat in the first. world war and the reparations
> it
> was forced to pay. In. modern Britain, one might guess that the majority
> English who are behind. the persecution feel pressured by the swiftly
> dimini****ng status of Britain in. the world, and the rapidly increasing
> coloured colonisation. of their country, which in time will see the
ethnic
> English a. minority in their own land, and their more antisocial
elements,
> unable to reply to. the obvious threat, instead project their aggression
> onto another, weaker,. unit minority
>
> In both cases there is a whiff of "holy. war" or irrational obsession
with
> the persecution.. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years ago
bordered
> on the not-quite-sane, and the current British behaviour. towards their
> chosen. victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the
> choices open to the victims are the same, since MI5. will never allow me
> to
> escape them, "if he tries. to run away we'll find him", just like the
> commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the. only escape is
> through. the chimney".
>
> The Victim Will Destroy Us if. We Dont Destroy Him First
>
>The persecutors propaganda. is the same. Fifty years ago the Germans
said,
> "if we don't do. it to the Jews then the Jews will do it to us"; and
MI5's
> propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on. their victim as a
> "monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority.
>
> "We are decent fellows" say the Brutal. Persecutors
>
> During the course of researching this. article I read part of the very
> interesting book, "Hitler - A Study in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock.. This
> volume contains a quote from. Himmler on the "Final Solution";
>
> "Most. of you know what it means when a hundred corpses are lying side
by
> side, or five hundred. or one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at the
> same time .... to. have remained decent fellows, that is what has made
us
> hard. This is a page of. glory in our history which has never been
written
> and is. never to be written."
>
> In the. MI5 persecution, too, there is a thread of deliberate brutality
to
> the sick and. vulnerable, while the persecutors maintain that "we are
> decent fellows". There is. almost a conscious schizophrenia in the
> self-attitudes of the Security Service operatives and. those in the
public
> who they employ against. me, which reflects the contradiction evident in
> the German attitude above. On the one hand, they stoop to the. lowest
and
> most base behaviour; yet at the same time, the MI5 operatives. tell
> themselves that since they are. civilised British people, then surely
they
> must by. definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency is made the fault
> of
> the victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we need feel. no guilt".
>
> Yet the conduct is. atypical of the way these peoples see their normal
> modes. of behaviour. Befslaughter was not typical of normal German
> behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the. current MI5 abuse goes
against
> the grain of British self-image as being. "reserved" and "decent", since
> they are using terms of abuse which are. common among blacks and other
> supposedly less-developed races, but not among the. English.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The ultimate aim of both persecutions is the humiliation and. physical
> extinction of the persecuted group. The Germans did this in a. very
direct
> way; the. British Secret Police MI5 are acting indirectly and relying on
> self-extinction of their target, because. in peacetime and in the
current
> somewhat false climate of "political correctness". more direct methods
are
> impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct. action the mass "omerta" would
> be
> broken.
>
> I have written this. article with sincerity to show how a historically
> recent persecution in another country parallels what is being. done in
> this
> country today. In both. cases, the evil-doers are of their countries
> establishments, and. rely on widespread tacit sup****t to maintain the
> persecution and omerta around it. While the holocaust. was undoubtedly
the
> greater evil, it. is im****tant to be aware of the fact that had the
> Germans
> not been. defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have gone through
to
> total completion. In Britain today no. force threatens the "permanent
> government" of which the Security Service forms a part; and it looks.
very
> unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated. by the MI5 secret police will ever
> be
> revealed to public. view, and the British secret state brought to
justice
> for its. evil actions.
>
> 1297
>
|
