On Apr 24, 12:28 pm, PL <pl.nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[snipping ****tions of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
to bother with]
> > GW's credibility (on Cuba anyway) went down the toilet
>
> (snip)
>
> Nope.
> Your lie was exposed.
Only in your genocidal wet dreams, Mr. Lobbyist.
> > some years ago
>
> > when they were forced to remove those outrageous claims of 75,000
> > deaths in Cuba. (snip)
>
> That was about the consensus then.
Only in Miami. I don't even recall your CIA colleagues ever buying
into this bull**** -- not in recent years anyway. The rest of the
world -- including mainstream groups like Amnesty International and
Human Rights Watch-- seemed to know Rummell and the others were full
of ****. Eventually, even GW had to eat crow and yanked these
outrageous claims from their website.
Here is what HRW, as long ago as 1989, had to say about the
exaggerated claims of your political masters in Miami and Wa****ngton:
"...[T]he Commission's initial decision to review human rights in Cuba
was due in large part to exaggerated U.S. charges of ongoing political
executions, disappearances and torture... [T]he U.N. delegation to
Cuba found no evidence to sup****t those allegations."
http://www.hrw.org/re****ts/1989/WR89/Cuba.htm
> Now it higher thanks to the painstaking work of lots of people, no?
No. Groups like AI and HRW still seem to think you are full of ****.
Even GW doesn't seem to be interested in getting their butts kicked
again. At their website, I don't think you will find so much as a link
to any of your various mafia websites. Must be frustrating as hell for
all you embargo-Nazis.
> >>>>> despite decades of genocidal US trade sanctions,(snip)
> >>> [snip]
> >>> What Mr. Lobbyist snipped for obvious reasons:
> >>> You mean "basic conditions" like dismantling the political system
> >> ending the dictator****p you mean.
>
> > I mean not even holding US-style, money-based elections would stop the
> > genocide if your political didn't approve of the result.
>
> there is no "genocide" to stop comrade Dan.
Still in denial, eh, Nazi boy? (See featured article, "Is the US
embargo a form of genocide?" at my website.
> the US trade sanctions aren't genocide and they are not referred to as
> such by any reputable international organization.
>
Even Amnesty International was forced to concede that your beloved
embargo is "used to harm the most vulnerable members of [Cuban]
society." Do you deny it?
> >> The US is the largest food supplier of Cuba
>
> > [snip]
>
> > Already debunked here.
>
> Nope.
> Confirmed by the like of Granma (the paper of the communist party in
> Cuba) and the head of their food im****t organization.
>
> Another desperate lie of Dan Christensen exposed:
>
> "According to Alim****t, in 2006, the total in im****ts and related costs
> paid to U.S. companies exceeded $570.8 million."
>
[snip]
Do the math, Mr. Lobbyist. (Never your strong suit, I know.) Even if
this was all food -- it includes "related costs" -- it amounts to only
14 cents worth of im****ted food per Cuban per day. This is only
slightly more than the 8 cent per day figure based on official US
data, and certainly not enough to get you and your political masters
off the hook for what amounts to genocide.
> >>>> US officials themselves have said that change must come from within
and
> >>>> they want to sup****t that change.
> >>> [snip]
> >>> Helms-Burton (Section 206), which is still in effect, betrays their
> >>> hidden motives, as we see above.
> >> (snip)
>
> >> Nope.
> >> the law as a whole states the motives, but then as usual you want to
> >> abuse snippets out of context as that is the only way you can hope to
> >> mislead people.
>
> > [snip]
>
> > As usual, you want to cover up their real motives
>
> (snip)
>
You can snip, but you cannot hide, Mr. Lobbyist. What he snipped again
for obvious reasons:
"As usual, you want to cover up their real motives -- to force a
political system on the Cuban people, a system that you clearly
believe they would never willingly accept. Why else have, as a
condition for lifting these cruel sanctions, that Cuba's socialist
system must be replaced by a "market-oriented economic system" based
on private property? (HB, Section 206) "
Enough of your pathetic evasions then, Mr. Lobbyist. Answer the
question or once again be exposed for the disgusting, hateful little
man that you are.
Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at
http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/CubaFAQ.html
|
