NO THREAT TO AMERICAN SECURITY
'Regime change' falls to Cubans
Published Saturday, May 10, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
Florida's junior U.S. Senator Mel Martinez a few days ago reiterated his
opposition to any relaxation of the U.S. trade and travel embargo
against Cuba.
In a statement advocating "regime change" as the object of our policy
toward Cuba, he said, "The debate about Cuba should not be about the
embargo. It's not a policy in and of itself. A change in the government
is the ultimate goal."
In all humility, I would like to submit that the senator is wrong. Cuba
belongs to Cubans, and it is up to them to keep or change their
government.
I would hope we have learned at great cost in blood and treasure that it
is folly to make "regime change" the central theme of our policy toward
any nation which is not a threat to our security.
Yes, we should pay close attention to any country lying 90 miles from
our shores.
Yes, there was a time, some four decades ago, when Communist Cuba was
allowing the Communist Soviet Union to use it as a base for nuclear
weapons.
That was at the height of the Cold War, which could easily become a Hot
War. Those weapons were a direct and immediate threat to us, and it was
absolutely incumbent on our government to declare our intentions to use
whatever measures might be necessary to get them removed.
Fortunately, once our intentions were known, a swift diplomatic maneuver
led to a promise to remove the missiles, and they were indeed dismantled
and shipped out.
A similar threat today would call for a similar response. But the
situation is vastly different. The USSR has dissolved into several
different nations. By far the largest, Russia, is still communist, still
not what you would call friendly, but much diminished in expansionist
zeal and in its isolation from the rest of the industrial world.
We do not and should not fully trust its intentions, but we are on
speaking terms and willing to do business with them.
Cuba is still communist, still a dictatorship, but the dictator is now
Raul, not Fidel, Castro. Whether Raul will be an improvement over his
brother either in the treatment of the people of Cuba or his feelings
about the United States we do not yet know.
But, clearly, Cuba is not a military threat to the United States. And,
clearly, our decades-long embargo is a failed policy whose most notable
result has been bringing hundreds of thousands of refugees to South
Florida.
Like Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Cuba's Fidel Castro is not a good and kind
human being. Like Hussein, Castro held on to power by arresting,
jailing, killing members of the opposition. He persecuted the Catholic
Church, confiscated private property, wrecked the economy and
obliterated human rights.
One of the most effective ploys used by Fidel was to justify his
inhumane tactics as necessary to protect Cuba from the rampant
imperialism of the United States.
It is not very smart for us to leave that same tactic available to Raul
Castro or any other Cuban leader. We should make it clear that we
recognize that any changes in Cuba should be made only by the Cuban
people. We should disavow any desire to use an embargo or any other kind
of clout to install a new government in Cuba.
Whether Sen. Martinez can be comfortable with such a policy is open to
doubt. He left Cuba when he was 15 years old and came to this country.
His parents followed later. It is easy to understand how he would like
to use American pressure to return Cuba to the pre-Castro days of his
youth.
That does not make it the right thing to do. And enough of the million
Cuban-Americans in Florida have come around to that point of view to
raise a question if it is even the politically necessary thing to do.
A recent survey by the Institute for Public Opinion Research and the
Cuban Research Institute of Florida International University found that
65 percent of Cuban-Americans would support U.S. dialogue with the Cuban
government. More than half of Cuban-Americans support the embargo, but
almost three fourths of them think it has not worked well.
Those numbers indicate there is among Cuban-Americans a large enough
difference of opinion to make it possible for candidates for national or
state office to win in Florida without endorsing regime change in Cuba
or continuing the futile embargo.
And I consider that good news -- of which there is not a lot going
around these days.
Waldo Proffitt is the former editor of the Herald-Tribune.
E-mail:wproffitt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
