On May 13, 3:07=A0pm, PL <pl.nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[snipping ****tions of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
to bother with]
> > Some time ago, I wrote to GW president, Gregory Stanton, (snip)
>
What Mr. Lobbyist snipped in his utter despair:
Some time ago, I wrote to GW president, Gregory Stanton, pointing out
to him that no mainstream human rights group like Amnesty
International or Human Rights Watch will sup****t the outrageous claims
at his website of some 75,000 deaths in Cuba. He could not explain
this, and simply referred me to their only source on Cuba -- a book by
US-based academic, Rudy Rummell. Apparently GW has never actually
investigated anything at all to do with Cuba! There isn't a single
article devoted to Cuba at their website -- only a large table listing
dozens of countries, perhaps for the purpose of impressing potential
donors, with a one-liner about Cuba.
Anyway, some time late in 2005, they withdrew their outrageous claim.
I won't claim responsibility, but now they wisely decline to give any
specific figure at all -- progress of a sort, I guess.
Similarly the same year, the London-based International Centre for
Prison Studies, year also backed down on their outrageous claims about
Cuba. Now, they list the USA as having the highest incarceration rate
in the world, with Cuba a distant 8th. Must be frustrating as hell,
eh, Mr. Lobbyist?
Here is what HRW, as long ago as 1989, had to say about the
exaggerated claims of your political masters in Miami and
Wa****ngton:
"...[T]he Commission's initial decision to review human rights in Cuba
was due in large part to exaggerated U.S. charges of ongoing political
executions, disappearances and torture... [T]he U.N. delegation to
Cuba found no evidence to sup****t those allegations."
http://www.hrw.org/re****ts/1989/WR89/Cuba.htm
> Dan Christensen's exposed lie =A0about Genocide Watch.
>
> Dan falsely claimed the organization had copied (mindlessly) a number
> from a
> book by Rummel. Another case of false claims of =A0"private
information".
> Upon verification it became clear that Rummel quoted a figure of 73,000
> deaths attributable to the Castro regime. Genocide Watch showed a figure
o=
f
> 75,000 which comrade Dan promptly attributed to "sloppiness" in copying.
>
[snip]
Poor, pathetic little "Miss" Lobbyist... Just the thought of
confirming another source makes her poop her little pink panties! She
would much rather play it safe with her silly little girlish games
here, than risk getting her fat butt kicked again. Once bitten, twice
shy, eh, "Miss" Lobbyist??? (Hee, hee!)
Anyway, if you still have not found those long-lost balls of yours,
and are still not man enough to write to Mr. Stanton
(genocidewatch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
), to confirm his sources for these outrageous
claims, do not expect a reply from me on this matter. Not that if
really matters at this at this point, since as you yourself have
confirmed, these outrageous claims were quietly yanked from the GW
website some time ago.
So it looks like that the only genocide here is in fact your beloved
embargo -- your very own Final Solution. Dolf would have been so proud
of you. No one hated commies more than he did!
> >> The US is providing about third of the basic foodstuffs Cubans
receive
> >> in the rationing.
>
> > According to official US data for 2006, US food ex****ts to to Cuba
> > amounted to no more than about 8 cents worth of food per day per(snip)
>
> and that amounts to about 1/3 of the food Cubans get from the rationing,
n=
o?
[snip]
No matter how you slice it, 8 cents worth of im****ted food per person
per day is cannot be a significant part of the average Cuban's diet,
Mr. Lobbyist. Certainly not enough to get you off the hook for what
amounts to genocide.
> > You yourself have just done so again with your refusal here to e(snip)
>
> allow you to divert attention with lies.
> Indeed, that is what I did.
> My record is clear: I condemn all abuses of human rights.
[snip]
Very evasive, Mr. Lobbyist. Then please comment specifically on the
crimes of the Bush regime as re****ted by Amnesty International. We
know you can't. Like an old Nazi, you are STILL in denial even after
all these years. Oh, well.
Do get back to us when you are man enough to face up to what you
really are, "Miss" Lobbyist -- nothing but an apologist for what
amounts to genocide, like your friend (alter ego?), the self-styled
hoaxaco$t revisionist (sic)?
> > What Mr. Lobbyist snipped for obvious reasons:
>
> > "Amnesty International has called for the US embargo against Cuba to
> > be lifted,(snip)
>
What Mr. Lobbyist keeps snipping in his utter despair:
"Amnesty International has called for the US embargo against Cuba to
be lifted, as it is highly detrimental to Cubans' enjoyment of a range
of economic, social and cultural rights, such as the right to food,
health and sanitation - particularly affecting the weakest and most
vulnerable members of the population. According to UNICEF, the
availability of medicines and basic medical materials has decreased in
Cuba as a consequence of the US embargo against the island." (AI
website)
> and it has asked for an end to human rights abuses, torture, .... but
> that doesn't interest Castro Lobbyist Dan Christensen.
>
[snip]
Very evasive, Mr. Lobbyist. It seems our Mr. Lobbyist really doesn't
care that, as Amnesty International has put it, his beloved embargo is
"used to harm the most vulnerable members of [Cuban] society."
Whatever it takes, right, Mr. Lobbyist?
Contrary to your lies, as we see above (in the text you so desperately
keep snipping), AI does any attach ANY conditions to the lifting of
these cruel sanctions. Once again, you demonstrate just how truly
desperate, stupid and cruel you really are, Mr. Lobbyist. You are one
disgusting, hateful little man!
Dan
Visit my CUBA: Issues & Answers website at
http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/Cuba=
FAQ.html
|
