Re: What about a petition against the genocidal trade sanctions?

On 18 mei, 06:38, Dan Christensen <dch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 17, 3:52 pm, PL <pl.nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> [snipping ****tions of PL's posting already debunked here, or too lame
> to bother with]
>
> > >>>>>> Your activities as a lying pro-castro lobbyist are well
do***ented in
> > >>>>>> SCC.
> > >>>>> Oh, really?
> > >>>> Not my words: you bragged about contacting various people in
sup****t of
> > >>>> the Cuban regime with an aim to influence their public
statements.
> > >>> [snip]
> > >>> How amusing. Can you give us even one example of what you are
talking
> > >>> about here?
> > >> Contacting certain medical doctors (US and SA based) on Cuba.
>
> > > Just confirming sources
>
> > not what I heard and certainly not confirmed by your actions.
>
> My actions were to confirm that you were deliberately spreading lies
> about these people.
(cut)

Mr. Christensen, in each of the cases above according to my research
it was you that ended up being branded as the one that was spreading
lies.
Nowhere ever any of these experts has changed his of her public
statements - the result you were lobbying for - no?
If I am mistaken here then please post the messages where they new
public statements were re****ted.
All I saw from you is stuff where you claim other people said this or
that without any proof whatsover.
In one case a text was posted (that you did not ever even try to
dispute as not being genuine and which must therefore have been known
to you in my opinion) where the party you quoted said in terms that
could not be misunderstood that what you had posted was a
misrepresentation to say the least.
I have personally seen that you are in most cases unable to come up
with any proof when challanged remember the golfing claims you made)
or say blatant lies (on the nature of the Club Med in Varadero).
So sorry: not enough for anyone and by any standard.
As far as Genocide Watch is concerned, there again we see a lot of
unsubstantiated claims on your part and a body of hard evidence on the
part of those that exposed your inconsistencies.
Again, that can't but show again where the thruth can be found and
gthat isn't from you, that is very clear to me know.
I know you will again reply without addressing the issues and with
lots of personal attacks.
Frankly I don't care.
It will just again show who you truly are Mr. Christensen.
Not that many people still need to get any more proof from you on hwta
you are about and what your character is.

Chris