chris wrote:
> Note: my fisrt reply didn't show up so I am trying again.
>
> On 18 mei, 21:38, Dan Christensen <dch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 18, 1:57 pm, chris <christiane.stock...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > [snipping ****tions of Chris's posting already debunked here, or too
> > lame to bother with]
> >
> > > > > Your activities as a lying pro-castro lobbyist are well
do***ented in SCC.
> >
> > > > Oh, really? We know that we you are on record actually bragging
about
> > > > your lobbying exploits (see "PL = Paid Lobbyist?"),
> >
> > > actually Mr. Christensen your inability to post anything to back up
> > > any of the claims (see the golf thing), the fact that part of it was
> > > exposed a self-serving lie (the nature of the Club Med hotel in
> > > Varadero) and the attempt to use partial snippings from a message
> > > that said the opposite of what you claimed to mislead people (the
> > > "lobby" sarcastic remarks with the denial of the fact in front) has
> > > shown that this is just a slanderous lie that you malignously spread
> > > about PL
> >
> > Not my words
>
> Yes your words, Mr. Christensen.
> PL has only denied these false accusations.
>
> > PL has painted himself into a corner
> (cut)
>
> No, Mr. Christensen, you tried to paint him in to a corner and ended
> up exposed as a liar over and over again.
Chris: your flogging a dead horse here.
This Dan guy is a liar and a cheat.
He doesn't care **** about the truth.
> > > > but where is your
> > > > proof I have been paid to "lobby" anyone?
> >
> > > can you tell me where PL has ever claimed that you were being paid
for
> > > the lobbying you do?
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > He hasn't said so directly
>
> so you admit you lied.
> That is a start I guess.
of course Dan Christensen lied
> > he isn't THAT stupid
>
> No, he isn't stupid at all.
>
> > -- but his own
> > words imply
>
> "imply" Mr. Christensen? No stae?
> You seem to be getting cautious and insucure.
>
> > this (those "Belgian ministers" of his at Club Med, for
> > instance). He desperately wants us to believe what a great mover and
> > shaker he is on the world stage, hence his boasting of his exploits
> > that he has since come to thoroughly regret.
>
> No, Mr. Christensen, quite the contrary.
> PL never claimed to be anything else than someone concerned with the
> human rights of family, friends and the rest of Cubans.
> People like you have been trying to misrepresent him as anything more
> (CIA, lobbyist, ...) in your attempt to buld him up in to something he
> isn't and never claimed to be to explain your own failure.
> People like you that think they are better than others can't accept
> being defeated by a regular person posting facts. To explain away your
> own ineffectiveness and inneficiency you have to build PL up to
> something he isn't in order to explain away your failure to yourself
> and others.
> You seem to suffer from low self-esteem and try to compensate for
> that.
Chris, the man isn't worth your time.
He is an irritant, but he has no credibility in this group.
He might as well be posting in Chinese
Mark.
NB: I took your hint and protected my privacy.
Given the facts about this guy Dan Christensen on the web it makes
sense
|
