On 30 mei, 14:47, mark.inor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> chris wrote:
> > Note: my fisrt reply didn't show up so I am trying again.
>
> > On 18 mei, 21:38, Dan Christensen <dch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On May 18, 1:57 pm, chris <christiane.stock...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > [snipping ****tions of Chris's posting already debunked here, or too
> > > lame to bother with]
>
> > > > > > Your activities as a lying pro-castro lobbyist are well
do***ented in SCC.
>
> > > > > Oh, really? We know that we you are on record actually bragging
about
> > > > > your lobbying exploits (see "PL = Paid Lobbyist?"),
>
> > > > actually Mr. Christensen your inability to post anything to back
up
> > > > any of the claims (see the golf thing), the fact that part of it
was
> > > > exposed a self-serving lie (the nature of the Club Med hotel in
> > > > Varadero) and the attempt to use partial snippings from a message
> > > > that said the opposite of what you claimed to mislead people (the
> > > > "lobby" sarcastic remarks with the denial of the fact in front)
has
> > > > shown that this is just a slanderous lie that you malignously
spread
> > > > about PL
>
> > > Not my words
>
> > Yes your words, Mr. Christensen.
> > PL has only denied these false accusations.
>
> > > PL has painted himself into a corner
> > (cut)
>
> > No, Mr. Christensen, you tried to paint him in to a corner and ended
> > up exposed as a liar over and over again.
>
> Chris: your flogging a dead horse here.
> This Dan guy is a liar and a cheat.
> He doesn't care **** about the truth.
>
> > > > > but where is your
> > > > > proof I have been paid to "lobby" anyone?
>
> > > > can you tell me where PL has ever claimed that you were being paid
for
> > > > the lobbying you do?
>
> > > [snip]
>
> > > He hasn't said so directly
>
> > so you admit you lied.
> > That is a start I guess.
>
> of course Dan Christensen lied
>
>
>
> > > he isn't THAT stupid
>
> > No, he isn't stupid at all.
>
> > > -- but his own
> > > words imply
>
> > "imply" Mr. Christensen? No stae?
> > You seem to be getting cautious and insucure.
>
> > > this (those "Belgian ministers" of his at Club Med, for
> > > instance). He desperately wants us to believe what a great mover and
> > > shaker he is on the world stage, hence his boasting of his exploits
> > > that he has since come to thoroughly regret.
>
> > No, Mr. Christensen, quite the contrary.
> > PL never claimed to be anything else than someone concerned with the
> > human rights of family, friends and the rest of Cubans.
> > People like you have been trying to misrepresent him as anything more
> > (CIA, lobbyist, ...) in your attempt to buld him up in to something he
> > isn't and never claimed to be to explain your own failure.
> > People like you that think they are better than others can't accept
> > being defeated by a regular person posting facts. To explain away your
> > own ineffectiveness and inneficiency you have to build PL up to
> > something he isn't in order to explain away your failure to yourself
> > and others.
> > You seem to suffer from low self-esteem and try to compensate for
> > that.
>
> Chris, the man isn't worth your time.
> He is an irritant, but he has no credibility in this group.
> He might as well be posting in Chinese
>
> Mark.
>
> NB: I took your hint and protected my privacy.
> Given the facts about this guy Dan Christensen on the web it makes
> sense
You were smart to do so.
Your mailbox will be receiving some crap soon.
I saw he didn't take your bait.
Chris
|
