On Jan 21, 5:38=A0pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <15db3f54-bba0-4073-89db-f60f3ae9e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> =A0kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > A annual tribute to civil rights movement, or to the cult
> > of a socialist "saint"?
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/3a7pmg
>
> OK, this is just dirt dug up by some Southern redneck and you go along
> with it? Racist, bigoted intolerant and pining for the return of
> slavery, are we? I actually find this posting on this day insulting and
> I am blocking your posts until MLK Day 2009.
>
> Who needs this crap? I certainly don't! Find yourself a local clavern,
> why don't you!
>
> K
You can feign politically correct indignation, and
slather your groupthink over my analytical dump-
lings all you want, but you can't hide the meat,
which are the facts that King was a plagiarist, wo-
manizer, and self-promoter, much in the same style
as most of his subsequently famous disciples -
all of which were briskly purged from our collective
conscience as a result of his premature demise,
and canonization.
My question simply is this - does this man truly
deserve to be the only one actually named on the
list of our official holidays? How about just "Na-
tional Civil Rights day"? Would you personally go
along with that?
|
