On Feb 12, 12:53=A0pm, "Jenicek" <Jeni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "kujebak" <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:b281cc02-6ce2-423c-8bc4-b6515d589656@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 12, 8:11 am, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <f41e7877-8d70-4d34-b8b4-c1f769627...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Hillary's Clinton's letter to Steve Capus, NBC News president,
> > > in response to MSNBC's re****ter's comment about Chelsey
> > > Clinton's involvement in her campaign:
> > > (http://tinyurl.com/2kr3lz)
>
> > > Dear Mr. Capus,
>
> > > Thank you for your call yesterday. I wanted to send you this
> > > note to convey the depth of my feeling about David Shuster's
> > > comments.
>
> > > I know that I am a public figure and that my daughter is playing
> > > a public role in my campaign. I am accustomed to criticism,
> > > certainly from MSNBC. I know that it goes with the territory.
>
> > > However, I became Chelsea's mother long before I ran for any
> > > office and I will always be a mom first and a public official
second.
>
> > > Nothing justifies the kind of debasing language that David Shuster
> > > used and NO TEM****ARY SUSPENSION OR HALF HEARTED
> > > APOLOGY IS SUFFICIENT.*
>
> > > I would urge you to look at the pattern of behavior on your network
> > > that seems to repeatedly lead to this sort of degrading language.
>
> > > There's a lot at stake for our country in this election. Surely, you
> > > can do your jobs as journalists and commentators and still keep
> > > the discourse civil and appropriate.
>
> > > Sincerely,
>
> > > Hillary Rodham Clinton
>
> > >
----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----=AD=AD---
> > > -------------
> > > * Emphasis kujebak's
>
> > > Needless to say, Schuster's career with MSNBC is over.
> > > Is this the beginning of the end for (Bill and) Hillary, or the
> > > end of a civil beginning? What could be more delicious
> > > than seeing her broom on fire, eh, Mr Kriz?
>
> > Storm in a teacup...
>
> My point, in case you missed it, is this:
> Things are clearly peachy as long as the foul language
> of this despicable news organization is aimed at the
> right:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ywydwc
>
> Can you imagine Bush demanding the job of every left
> winger in the media, who has spoken of him and his
> administration disparagingly on camera? There would
> be throngs of unemployed, and unemployable journalists
> crowding the soup kitchens :-)
>
> As far as Clinton is concerned, you cannot deny that
> her visceral reaction did not serve her well. It is clear
> there is no one left in her campaign, who knows better,
> and who has the guts to tell her the truth.
>
> Yes, yes and again yes - Osama Obama is the king (with Cuban flag in his
> office and Guevara picture on the wall)
> But who will be the president? Senile old man
That will largely depend on Hillary, and her
conduct from now on. Obama doesn't stand
a chance without her endorsement. The pro-
blem (for the Democrats) is, she would rather
die than play second fiddle. So I would say,
McCain ;-)
|
