Re: Je neco shnileho ve Statech Spojenych

In article <fovata$uie$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Frank Bures <feeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Diversity of opinion is squashed, sometimes with savagely hypocritical 
> zeal. At Indian River Community College in Florida, the Christian 
> Fellow****p was refused the right to show The Passion of the Christ
because 
> it was "R rated," but a play called F--king for Jesus was permitted, 
> featuring a girl masturbating before a picture of Jesus.

While any kind of censor****p is deplorable, personally I'd go to see 
"****ing for Jesus" before wild horses would drag me to see "The Passion 
of Christ". But that is a purely personal preference - masturbation 
being decidedly a more benign activity than sado-maso torture, 
gratuitous violence flavored with racist overtones and human 
crucifixion. But each to his own.

The rest of the article is a total waste of time. Some of these 
incidents may be true, some partially true, some are invented. It all 
belongs into the same box of curios and myths that O'Reilly dusts off 
every Christmas trying to show himself off as The Crusader for Christmas 
that he imagines is under some obscure attack. Did you notice that 
there's NEVER any kind of a corroboration in these articles? I don't see 
any. All I read is sniveling.

But again, each to his own. If you feel that "niggah" is preferable to 
"African American" take your sorry ass to Brooklyn and talk to a few 
people that way. You'll make many friends, fer sure.

K