Re: Je neco shnileho ve Statech Spojenych

On Feb 13, 10:57=A0am, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <fovata$ui...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> =A0Frank Bures <f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Diversity of opinion is squashed, sometimes with savagely hypocritical
> > zeal. At Indian River Community College in Florida, the Christian
> > Fellow****p was refused the right to show The Passion of the Christ
becau=
se
> > it was "R rated," but a play called F--king for Jesus was permitted,
> > featuring a girl masturbating before a picture of Jesus.
>
> While any kind of censor****p is deplorable, personally I'd go to see
> "****ing for Jesus" before wild horses would drag me to see "The Passion
> of Christ". But that is a purely personal preference - masturbation
> being decidedly a more benign activity than sado-maso torture,
> gratuitous violence flavored with racist overtones and human
> crucifixion. But each to his own.
>
> The rest of the article is a total waste of time. Some of these
> incidents may be true, some partially true, some are invented. It all
> belongs into the same box of curios and myths that O'Reilly dusts off
> every Christmas trying to show himself off as The Crusader for Christmas
> that he imagines is under some obscure attack. Did you notice that
> there's NEVER any kind of a corroboration in these articles? I don't see
> any. All I read is sniveling.
>
> But again, each to his own. If you feel that "niggah" is preferable to
> "African American" take your sorry ass to Brooklyn and talk to a few
> people that way. You'll make many friends, fer sure.
>
> K

Your personal preferences are irrelevant.
The issue brought up here is campus censor****p,
which, apparently, does not bother you.
I'm not the only one who finds your attitude intel-
lectually dishonest, and somewhat peculiar, con-
sidering your background.