Re: Je neco shnileho v tomto clanku

In article <fpelj9$5ep$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Frank Bures <feeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Karel Kriz wrote:
> > In article <fovata$uie$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Frank Bures <feeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> >> The camera does not lie: Former centres of learning and intellectual 
> >> diversity are now indoctrination sites systemically dedicated to the 
> >> abbreviation of human curiosity and the alienation of students from 
> >> Western 
> >> civilization.
> >>
> >> I often wonder where in Canada I could "go home again" in the 21st 
> >> century. 
> >> I have one simple, symbolic criterion: a learning centre that would
still 
> >> hold up for critical admiration the greatness in the writings of
Thomas 
> >> Wolfe, a hard-drinking, aggressively hetero***ual white male from a
racist 
> >> background, whose creative inspiration was Western civilization's
literary 
> >> treasure trove and whose overriding theme was his passion for
America.
> >>
> >> That's a tall order nowadays. I only know one three-year arts program
in 
> >> Canada today I'd be glad to call my intellectual home, and I fear for
its 
> >> survival.
> > 
> > This article blew me away. Bures accused me of just "scanning it", but

> > NO-OOO, I read every word. 
> 
> To put words in someone mouth is not too ethical, but it happens.
> To intentionally misquote someone is reaching new low even for you.
> There is no phrase "scanning it" anywhere in my original post.

A new low? Even for me? What on earth are you talking about?

You wrote:
"Karel,

have you read the article?  Or just glanced over it?"

glanced = scanned more or less. So what's the problem?


K