On Mar 1, 12:09=A0am, KLa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I read that Moravia was affected by the Mongol invasion of 1241-42.
> Even though they were passing through from Poland on the way to
> Hungary, they apparently still did damage. Does anyone know what were
> the casualty figures (for lack of a better term) among the population,
> and who were brought in to help replenish it?
FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/lists/rkz-l/2001/msg00023.html
=B7 To: Multiple recipients of list RKZ-L <rkz-l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=B7 Subject: FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
=B7 From: "Jaroslav Gagan" <gagan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=B7 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:17:27 +0100
=B7 Reply-To: rkz-l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rkz-l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dobry den.
****ladatelstvi AKROPLIS vydalo knihu "Falza a podvody ceske historie"
(Praha 2001, 1. vydani, 184 stran), kterou napsali "nasi predni
historikove" - ucitele z Filozoficke fakulty University Karlovy.
Kniha ma 16 kapitol, z nich tri se venuji Rukopisum.
Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Cechura, DrSc. napsal clanek "O podivnem
vitezstvi
nad Mongoly" (s. 88-95), kde s odvolanim na "novejsi studium otazky"
uvadi, ze pobyt Mongolu na Morave byl vpravde epizodicky, trval snad
tyden... U prilezitosti 600. vyroci vpadu Tataru na Moravu podnikl
moravsky historiograf Antonin Bocek pokus ukazat, jake epochalni
udalosti
se tehdy staly na jeho rodne a milovane Morave. Autor napsal, ze
Bockovi
neveril Fr. Palacky ani dalsi vzdelani muzove 19. stoleti (panu
prof. Cechurovi bych do****ucil prohlednout Palackeho Dejiny narodu
ceskeho v Cechach a v Morave - rok 1241: "neni pochyby, ze bitva u
Olomouce stala se ku konci mesice cervna"). Klicovy dokument Bockuv -
Pamet pribyslavska je podle prof. Cechury nes****e falzum 19.
stoleti.
Skody, ktere mely ucinit Mongolove na Morave roku 1241, pochazeji z
Bockovy dilny, prip. od padelatelu slavnych Rukopisu.
O.K.
|
