<okyn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:59d0417f-030e-4334-aecd-a91584325639@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Mar 2, 10:37 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> <o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:a06f924e-53f8-461f-a57d-0300957dc0f3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >On Mar 1, 12:09 am, KLa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >> I read that Moravia was affected by the Mongol invasion of 1241-42.
>> >> Even though they were passing through from Poland on the way to
>> >> Hungary, they apparently still did damage. Does anyone know what
were
>> >> the casualty figures (for lack of a better term) among the
population,
>> >> and who were brought in to help replenish it?
>>
>> >FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
>> >http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/lists/rkz-l/2001/msg00023.html
>>
>> >· To: Multiple recipients of list RKZ-L <rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >· Subject: FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
>> >· From: "Jaroslav Gagan" <ga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >· Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:17:27 +0100
>> >· Reply-To: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >· Sender: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > Dobry den.
>>
>> >****ladatelstvi AKROPLIS vydalo knihu "Falza a podvody ceske historie"
>> >(Praha 2001, 1. vydani, 184 stran), kterou napsali "nasi predni
>> >historikove" - ucitele z Filozoficke fakulty University Karlovy.
>> >Kniha ma 16 kapitol, z nich tri se venuji Rukopisum.
>>
>> > Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Cechura, DrSc. napsal clanek "O podivnem
>> >vitezstvi
>> >nad Mongoly" (s. 88-95), kde s odvolanim na "novejsi studium otazky"
>> >uvadi, ze pobyt Mongolu na Morave byl vpravde epizodicky, trval snad
>> >tyden... U prilezitosti 600. vyroci vpadu Tataru na Moravu podnikl
>> >moravsky historiograf Antonin Bocek pokus ukazat, jake epochalni
>> >udalosti
>> >se tehdy staly na jeho rodne a milovane Morave. Autor napsal, ze
>> >Bockovi
>> >neveril Fr. Palacky ani dalsi vzdelani muzove 19. stoleti (panu
>> >prof. Cechurovi bych do****ucil prohlednout Palackeho Dejiny narodu
>> >ceskeho v Cechach a v Morave - rok 1241: "neni pochyby, ze bitva u
>> >Olomouce stala se ku konci mesice cervna"). Klicovy dokument Bockuv -
>> >Pamet pribyslavska je podle prof. Cechury nes****e falzum 19.
>> >stoleti.
>> >Skody, ktere mely ucinit Mongolove na Morave roku 1241, pochazeji z
>> >Bockovy dilny, prip. od padelatelu slavnych Rukopisu.
>> >O.K.
>>
>> Nethics shmethics!
>> Ten puvodni tazatel muze cist cesky?
>> pjk
>
>Ja myslim, ze mu to muze byt dovoleno, nebo snad ne, pane PJK?
>OK
NETHICS SHMETICS!!!
Ce'ce, to'ste mne uzemnil. Vasnosto, z vas ta yntelizence zrovna srsi.
To jste si, trdlo jedno, jeste nikde neprecetl, ze kdyz nekdo neznamy
na netu pise v jednom jazyce, tak je neslusne odpovedet v jazyce jinem?
Jiste ted ale napisete, ze se mylim, ze pana Kla... dobre znate, ze
to je bratranec manzelky holice dedecka byvaleho ucitele V. Klause
v narodni skole a tedy ho velice dobre znate a vite, ze umi cesky
a jeho rodina pochazi z Hornich Vestonic.
pjk
|
