On Mar 3, 10:38=A0pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> <o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:59d0417f-030e-4334-aecd-a91584325639@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 2, 10:37 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >wrote:
> >> <o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>news:a06f924e-53f8-461f-a57d-0300957dc0f3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >On Mar 1, 12:09 am, KLa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> I read that Moravia was affected by the Mongol invasion of
1241-42.
> >> >> Even though they were passing through from Poland on the way to
> >> >> Hungary, they apparently still did damage. Does anyone know what
wer=
e
> >> >> the casualty figures (for lack of a better term) among the
populatio=
n,
> >> >> and who were brought in to help replenish it?
>
> >> >FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
> >> >http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/lists/rkz-l/2001/msg00023.html
>
> >> >=B7 To: Multiple recipients of list RKZ-L <rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >=B7 Subject: FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
> >> >=B7 From: "Jaroslav Gagan" <ga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >=B7 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:17:27 +0100
> >> >=B7 Reply-To: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >=B7 Sender: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > Dobry den.
>
> >> >****ladatelstvi AKROPLIS vydalo knihu "Falza a podvody ceske
historie"
> >> >(Praha 2001, 1. vydani, 184 stran), kterou napsali "nasi predni
> >> >historikove" - ucitele z Filozoficke fakulty University Karlovy.
> >> >Kniha ma 16 kapitol, z nich tri se venuji Rukopisum.
>
> >> > Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Cechura, DrSc. napsal clanek "O podivnem
> >> >vitezstvi
> >> >nad Mongoly" (s. 88-95), kde s odvolanim na "novejsi studium otazky"
> >> >uvadi, ze pobyt Mongolu na Morave byl vpravde epizodicky, trval snad
> >> >tyden... U prilezitosti 600. vyroci vpadu Tataru na Moravu podnikl
> >> >moravsky historiograf Antonin Bocek pokus ukazat, jake epochalni
> >> >udalosti
> >> >se tehdy staly na jeho rodne a milovane Morave. Autor napsal, ze
> >> >Bockovi
> >> >neveril Fr. Palacky ani dalsi vzdelani muzove 19. stoleti (panu
> >> >prof. Cechurovi bych do****ucil prohlednout Palackeho Dejiny narodu
> >> >ceskeho v Cechach a v Morave - rok 1241: "neni pochyby, ze bitva u
> >> >Olomouce stala se ku konci mesice cervna"). Klicovy dokument Bockuv
-
> >> >Pamet pribyslavska je podle prof. Cechury nes****e falzum 19.
> >> >stoleti.
> >> >Skody, ktere mely ucinit Mongolove na Morave roku 1241, pochazeji z
> >> >Bockovy dilny, prip. od padelatelu slavnych Rukopisu.
> >> >O.K.
>
> >> Nethics shmethics!
> >> Ten puvodni tazatel muze cist cesky?
> >> pjk
>
> >Ja myslim, ze mu to muze byt dovoleno, nebo snad ne, pane PJK?
> >OK
>
> NETHICS SHMETICS!!!
>
> Ce'ce, to'ste mne uzemnil. Vasnosto, z vas ta yntelizence zrovna srsi.
> To jste si, trdlo jedno, jeste nikde neprecetl, ze kdyz nekdo neznamy
> na netu pise v jednom jazyce, tak je neslusne odpovedet v jazyce jinem?
>
> Jiste ted ale napisete, ze se mylim, ze pana Kla... dobre znate, ze
> to je bratranec manzelky holice dedecka byvaleho ucitele V. Klause
> v narodni skole a tedy ho velice dobre znate a vite, ze umi cesky
> a jeho rodina pochazi z Hornich Vestonic.
>
> pjk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Omyl, Vase Velicenstvo (predpokladam, ze jste dostatecne veliky, i
kdyz nevim kolik mate palcu) ta rodina pochazi z Dolnich a ne Hornich
Vestonic. Jak si jenom muzete plest Dul s Horou? Krome toho je od vas
neslusne odpovidat hatmatilkou, kdyz jsem vas oslovil cesky. Ted nevim
jestli to melo by oslovil nebo oslavil. Jde o oslo nebo o osla? Co je
slusnejsi osla oslovovat nebo oslavovat?
K.O.
|
