<okyn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4a7b9844-1310-4b34-a16e-1ad72772ae08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Mar 3, 10:38 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> <o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:59d0417f-030e-4334-aecd-a91584325639@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >On Mar 2, 10:37 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >wrote:
>> >> <o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>news:a06f924e-53f8-461f-a57d-0300957dc0f3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >On Mar 1, 12:09 am, KLa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >> >> I read that Moravia was affected by the Mongol invasion of
1241-42.
>> >> >> Even though they were passing through from Poland on the way to
>> >> >> Hungary, they apparently still did damage. Does anyone know what
were
>> >> >> the casualty figures (for lack of a better term) among the
population,
>> >> >> and who were brought in to help replenish it?
>>
>> >> >FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
>> >> >http://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/lists/rkz-l/2001/msg00023.html
>>
>> >> >· To: Multiple recipients of list RKZ-L <rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >· Subject: FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
>> >> >· From: "Jaroslav Gagan" <ga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >· Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:17:27 +0100
>> >> >· Reply-To: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >· Sender: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> > Dobry den.
>>
>> >> >****ladatelstvi AKROPLIS vydalo knihu "Falza a podvody ceske
historie"
>> >> >(Praha 2001, 1. vydani, 184 stran), kterou napsali "nasi predni
>> >> >historikove" - ucitele z Filozoficke fakulty University Karlovy.
>> >> >Kniha ma 16 kapitol, z nich tri se venuji Rukopisum.
>>
>> >> > Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Cechura, DrSc. napsal clanek "O podivnem
>> >> >vitezstvi
>> >> >nad Mongoly" (s. 88-95), kde s odvolanim na "novejsi studium
otazky"
>> >> >uvadi, ze pobyt Mongolu na Morave byl vpravde epizodicky, trval
snad
>> >> >tyden... U prilezitosti 600. vyroci vpadu Tataru na Moravu podnikl
>> >> >moravsky historiograf Antonin Bocek pokus ukazat, jake epochalni
>> >> >udalosti
>> >> >se tehdy staly na jeho rodne a milovane Morave. Autor napsal, ze
>> >> >Bockovi
>> >> >neveril Fr. Palacky ani dalsi vzdelani muzove 19. stoleti (panu
>> >> >prof. Cechurovi bych do****ucil prohlednout Palackeho Dejiny narodu
>> >> >ceskeho v Cechach a v Morave - rok 1241: "neni pochyby, ze bitva u
>> >> >Olomouce stala se ku konci mesice cervna"). Klicovy dokument Bockuv
-
>> >> >Pamet pribyslavska je podle prof. Cechury nes****e falzum 19.
>> >> >stoleti.
>> >> >Skody, ktere mely ucinit Mongolove na Morave roku 1241, pochazeji z
>> >> >Bockovy dilny, prip. od padelatelu slavnych Rukopisu.
>> >> >O.K.
>>
>> >> Nethics shmethics!
>> >> Ten puvodni tazatel muze cist cesky?
>> >> pjk
>>
>> >Ja myslim, ze mu to muze byt dovoleno, nebo snad ne, pane PJK?
>> >OK
>>
>> NETHICS SHMETICS!!!
>>
>> Ce'ce, to'ste mne uzemnil. Vasnosto, z vas ta yntelizence zrovna srsi.
>> To jste si, trdlo jedno, jeste nikde neprecetl, ze kdyz nekdo neznamy
>> na netu pise v jednom jazyce, tak je neslusne odpovedet v jazyce jinem?
>>
>> Jiste ted ale napisete, ze se mylim, ze pana Kla... dobre znate, ze
>> to je bratranec manzelky holice dedecka byvaleho ucitele V. Klause
>> v narodni skole a tedy ho velice dobre znate a vite, ze umi cesky
>> a jeho rodina pochazi z Hornich Vestonic.
>>
>> pjk
>
>Omyl, Vase Velicenstvo (predpokladam, ze jste dostatecne veliky, i
>kdyz nevim kolik mate palcu) ta rodina pochazi z Dolnich a ne Hornich
>Vestonic.
Horni Vestonice jsem napsal zcela zamerne a Horni Vestonice to jsou.
Nepletou si to voni trouba s Vestonickou Venusi z neolitu?
>Jak si jenom muzete plest Dul s Horou? Krome toho je od vas
>neslusne odpovidat hatmatilkou, kdyz jsem vas oslovil cesky.
Oslovil jste Kla..., ktery psal anglicky a ne mne.
Ohledne me odpovedi vam, prazsky cesky argot na rozhovor s
pohunky, sluzkami a metari je vhodny a zcela patricny pro hnupy
co odmitaji rozumet zakladnim principum slusnosti na netu.
NHPHZ ! (na hruby pytel hruba zaplata).
>Ted nevim
>jestli to melo by oslovil nebo oslavil. Jde o oslo nebo o osla? Co je
>slusnejsi osla oslovovat nebo oslavovat?
Osel, vosel, osral, vosral, to uz tu bylo, to da vzdy vsem
vocasum pul dne premysleni jake y tam napsat.
>K.O.


|