<KLange@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e1ea1ffd-01cd-4649-807a-0772589ff90c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Mar 2, 10:50 am, o...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 12:09 am, KLa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>> > I read that Moravia was affected by the Mongol invasion of 1241-42.
>> > Even though they were passing through from Poland on the way to
>> > Hungary, they apparently still did damage. Does anyone know what were
>> > the casualty figures (for lack of a better term) among the
population,
>> > and who were brought in to help replenish it?
>>
>> FALZA A PODVODY CESKE
HISTORIEhttp://mailman.fsv.cvut.cz/lists/rkz-l/2001/msg00023.html
>>
>> · To: Multiple recipients of list RKZ-L <rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> · Subject: FALZA A PODVODY CESKE HISTORIE
>> · From: "Jaroslav Gagan" <ga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> · Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:17:27 +0100
>> · Reply-To: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> · Sender: rk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Dobry den.
>>
>> ****ladatelstvi AKROPLIS vydalo knihu "Falza a podvody ceske historie"
>> (Praha 2001, 1. vydani, 184 stran), kterou napsali "nasi predni
>> historikove" - ucitele z Filozoficke fakulty University Karlovy.
>> Kniha ma 16 kapitol, z nich tri se venuji Rukopisum.
>>
>> Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Cechura, DrSc. napsal clanek "O podivnem
>> vitezstvi
>> nad Mongoly" (s. 88-95), kde s odvolanim na "novejsi studium otazky"
>> uvadi, ze pobyt Mongolu na Morave byl vpravde epizodicky, trval snad
>> tyden... U prilezitosti 600. vyroci vpadu Tataru na Moravu podnikl
>> moravsky historiograf Antonin Bocek pokus ukazat, jake epochalni
>> udalosti
>> se tehdy staly na jeho rodne a milovane Morave. Autor napsal, ze
>> Bockovi
>> neveril Fr. Palacky ani dalsi vzdelani muzove 19. stoleti (panu
>> prof. Cechurovi bych do****ucil prohlednout Palackeho Dejiny narodu
>> ceskeho v Cechach a v Morave - rok 1241: "neni pochyby, ze bitva u
>> Olomouce stala se ku konci mesice cervna"). Klicovy dokument Bockuv -
>> Pamet pribyslavska je podle prof. Cechury nes****e falzum 19.
>> stoleti.
>> Skody, ktere mely ucinit Mongolove na Morave roku 1241, pochazeji z
>> Bockovy dilny, prip. od padelatelu slavnych Rukopisu.
>> O.K.
>
>Could you maybe post a English translation please?
The gentleman has already been reminded that there is
well established netiquette rule by which one should
respond to English language posts in English. He responded
to that with childishly facetious and impertinent comments.
Nevertheless, the comments in his original post may be relevant.
The jest of it was that there are some real indications that
the damage caused by Mongols in 1241 was basically a myth
based on texts of well known forged manuscripts.
pjk
|
