Paul J Kriha wrote:
> "kujebak" <kujebak@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:731843fe-b3e8-4677-a507-015c78a8abd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >On Mar 28, 9:12 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> "Stan R" <aus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>
news:c852a0dd-2d0d-4d25-92e2-c8a5c4db020c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > On Mar 27, 3:07 pm, m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> > > [ quot ]
> >> > > ...
> >> > > the more beer a scientist drinks, the less likely the
> >> > > scientist is to publish a paper or to have a paper cited by
> >> > > another researcher, a measure of a paper's quality and
> >> > > im****tance.
> >>
> >> > > [ /quot ]
> >>
> >> > Could this possibly indicate that Jack Stone is unlikely to be a
> >> > scientist?
> >>
> >> It definitely indicates IQ below 80, but we shouldn't jump to
> >> any conclusion assuming he is not a scientist. :-)
> >
> >I agree. Anybody can be a scientist.
> >Anybody with an indisposition for honest work :-)
>
> Oh tut tut tut.
>
> You can't draw that particular conclusion from what I said. :-)
You're right. Disposition for honest work, just as
predilection for beer drinking, is not necessarily
a function of one's IQ.
What else can I agree with you on?
>
> pjk
|
