Karel Kriz wrote:
> In article <65m62nF2f1h3mU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Stan R <aus086@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Paul J Kriha contributed these words of wisdom on 04/04/08 16:05:
> > > "Karel Kriz" <karel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:karel-E81B00.17371803042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> In article
> > >> <24a7a531-8541-4c78-9c39-0fbb5486d740@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >> kujebak <kujebak@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>> On Apr 3, 8:12 am, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>> In article
> > >>>>
<95f2541a-72cf-45aa-afd1-9d9bf00c0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I do not have a predicament because I don't take xenophobic and
simple
> > >>>> minded mini movies seriously.
> > >>>>
> > >>> It very much looks like you're going to have to vote for Obama
> > >>> in November. You don't consider that a predicament?
> > >>>
> > >>>> K
> > >> That's very far from a given. That particular bridge will be
crossed
> > >> when we come to it. Personally, I do not care for Obama, but not
for the
> > >> reasons you might think.
> > >> Karel
> > >
> > > Oh, this is getting too hard, you're trying to make me think
> > > about what I think that kujebak thinks that Karel is thinking
> > > about his reasons for not caring for Obama. Damn, now
> > > I am thinking what would Obama think about all this if he
> > > read this thread.
> > >
> > > Bugger it, it's all somewhere far far away. I better get up
> > > and pour myself another glass of Chassagne-Montrachet.
> > > You cost me money you lot, you really do. Ruddy furriners.
> >
> > As far as I can tell from my vantage point a long way away from the
US,
> > Obama does not really "think" too deeply on any subject beyond how to
> > get elected.
> >
> > I guess that makes him no different to most politicians. On the "not
> > think too hard" motif, it also does not make him too different from
> > Charlie Cross.
>
> A couple of years ago, the Catholic church held a week-long conference
> on Limbo. Delegates from all over the world, respected theologians,
> religious scholars, priests and bishops discussed Limbo for a week. They
> tried to define Limbo, locate it and determine who will or should end up
> in Limbo after death.
>
> From my vantage point, also far away from the Vatican, it is
> inconceivable to think of a more monumental waste of time and human
> effort then this Limbo conference. With the possible exception of a
> pissing contest about which one of us ...thinks harder.
>
> K
There are plenty of "Limbo" fans out there, you know.
A lot of them voted for Clinton in open primaries.
He is probably the most significant reason why Hillary
is sort of still in the running ;-)
|
