"Karel Kriz" <karel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:karel-91D531.15014104042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article
> <57ebafbd-ffb9-4481-827c-a069a0a8c424@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> kujebak <kujebak@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Karel Kriz wrote:
[...]
> > > A couple of years ago, the Catholic church held a week-long
conference
> > > on Limbo. Delegates from all over the world, respected theologians,
> > > religious scholars, priests and bishops discussed Limbo for a week.
They
> > > tried to define Limbo, locate it and determine who will or should
end up
> > > in Limbo after death.
> > >
> > > From my vantage point, also far away from the Vatican, it is
> > > inconceivable to think of a more monumental waste of time and human
> > > effort then this Limbo conference. With the possible exception of a
> > > pissing contest about which one of us ...thinks harder.
> > >
> > > K
> >
> > There are plenty of "Limbo" fans out there, you know.
> > A lot of them voted for Clinton in open primaries.
> > He is probably the most significant reason why Hillary
> > is sort of still in the running ;-)
>
> Limbo, in this context is the state between heaven and hell where
> unbaptized children end up, reputedly for eternity. According to the
> Papal (papist?) doctrine, anyway.
No, you are wrong. And the pope is wrong too. Limbo is
this south of the border dance. Who manages to dance
it under the lowest horizontal bar gets the pretty girl from
the dancing troupe.
pjk
|
