On Apr 7, 4:52=A0pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <66c23acb-0c1c-4379-b603-2ae86c059...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> =A0kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2:25=A0pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <187c7e99-3ca6-44bc-a461-18ff3f86c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > =A0kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Apr 7, 12:30=A0pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > >
<77dc2f86-df3e-49a9-88ad-9a9facad3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
,
>
> > > > > =A0kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > >http://tinyurl.com/49nyj8
>
> > > > > Is this a good time for someone to pry the rifle from his cold,
de=
ad
> > > > > hands?
>
> > > > > ...a mediocre actor and a poseur. No greatness there...
>
> > > > > K
>
> > > > Did you know he was married for over 60 years?
> > > > To the same woman I might add.
> > > > That's quite remarkable in this day and age,
> > > > wouldn't you say? Especially for an actor, and
> > > > a ... whatever ;-)
>
> > > Marriage longevity is just one brownie point! Deduct two brownie
point=
s
> > > for being the front man for the NRA, deduct two brownie points for
The=
> > > Planet of The Apes, deduct two brownie points for Earthquake....and
on=
> > > and on. The final count is in the negative, I am afraid.
>
> > > K- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > You got something against guns in the hands of decent,
> > upstanding citizens Heston epitomized?
>
> I don't particularly care for guns regardless who has them. Firing a
> semi automatic rifle at defenseless cans of Coors in the desert is not
> an orgasmic experience for me.
>
Your personal attitude toward firearms is immaterial
in this context. The right to own firearms by private
citizens in this country is guaranteed by a Constitu-
tional provision. It is not a privilege subject to con-
census of personal opinions. Yours, or the NRA's.
> Misreading and misinterpreting the Second Amendment
> hardly qualifies as "decent and upstanding".
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, private gun
owner****p is not a misinterpretation of the Second
Amendment. Perhaps you know something no-
one else does?
> But I understand why NRA feels that everyone should be
> armed to the teeth. It all works so well. We have one of the
> lowest murder rates in the world and our prisons are half
> empty most of the time with the guards twiddling their
> thumbs with nothing to do. That makes us the envy of the
> world. The logic of "more guns - less crime" is a clear winner.
The belief that privately owned guns cause more crime
is based on the same kind of frizzy reasoning as your
"global warming" and "carbon pollution" nonsense.
No empirical connection between the cause and effect.
It is merely a fell-good argument.
>
> K- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
