In article
<2ce71f81-8aa5-4553-9ca1-54febdb8f244@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
kujebak <kujebak@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 4:52 pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > In article
> > <66c23acb-0c1c-4379-b603-2ae86c059...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Apr 7, 2:25 pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > >
<187c7e99-3ca6-44bc-a461-18ff3f86c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> > > > kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 7, 12:30 pm, Karel Kriz <ka...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > >
<77dc2f86-df3e-49a9-88ad-9a9facad3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >
> > > > > > kujebak <kuje...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > >http://tinyurl.com/49nyj8
> >
> > > > > > Is this a good time for someone to pry the rifle from his
cold, dead
> > > > > > hands?
> >
> > > > > > ...a mediocre actor and a poseur. No greatness there...
> >
> > > > > > K
> >
> > > > > Did you know he was married for over 60 years?
> > > > > To the same woman I might add.
> > > > > That's quite remarkable in this day and age,
> > > > > wouldn't you say? Especially for an actor, and
> > > > > a ... whatever ;-)
> >
> > > > Marriage longevity is just one brownie point! Deduct two brownie
points
> > > > for being the front man for the NRA, deduct two brownie points for
The
> > > > Planet of The Apes, deduct two brownie points for
Earthquake....and on
> > > > and on. The final count is in the negative, I am afraid.
> >
> > > > K- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > You got something against guns in the hands of decent,
> > > upstanding citizens Heston epitomized?
> >
> > I don't particularly care for guns regardless who has them. Firing a
> > semi automatic rifle at defenseless cans of Coors in the desert is not
> > an orgasmic experience for me.
> >
>
> Your personal attitude toward firearms is immaterial
> in this context. The right to own firearms by private
> citizens in this country is guaranteed by a Constitu-
> tional provision. It is not a privilege subject to con-
> census of personal opinions. Yours, or the NRA's.
>
> > Misreading and misinterpreting the Second Amendment
> > hardly qualifies as "decent and upstanding".
>
> According to the U.S. Supreme Court, private gun
> owner****p is not a misinterpretation of the Second
> Amendment. Perhaps you know something no-
> one else does?
Well, the Supreme Court also decided that GWB won the election in 2000.
Even though it is the highest legal authority in the land, it is hardly
impartial. As for me being "isolated" in my opinion that a bunch of
rednecks do not constitute a "well organized militia" you really are
misinformed. That debate continues and will continue as long as the NRA
"perpetrates a fraud on the American public" as Warren Burger, Supreme
Court Chief Justice succinctly put it.
>
> > But I understand why NRA feels that everyone should be
> > armed to the teeth. It all works so well. We have one of the
> > lowest murder rates in the world and our prisons are half
> > empty most of the time with the guards twiddling their
> > thumbs with nothing to do. That makes us the envy of the
> > world. The logic of "more guns - less crime" is a clear winner.
>
> The belief that privately owned guns cause more crime
> is based on the same kind of frizzy reasoning as your
> "global warming" and "carbon pollution" nonsense.
> No empirical connection between the cause and effect.
> It is merely a fell-good argument.
>
> >
> > K- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
|
