Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Czecho Slovak > Kujebak and th...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 8 Topic 4040 of 4094
Post > Topic >>

Kujebak and the absence of any responses.

by "aw" <awolf@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 02:56 PM

The absence of any responses to any of the direct
      health care arguments indicates that we have again
      managed to stretch your cranial ganglion to its limit.
      So give it a rest for a while, eh?
      Don't forget your assignment ;-)

      Kujebaku neboj,  Feeb te pod****i i kdyz budes placat (jako vzdy 
piciciny).:-))))))))))))))))))))))))

              US health insurance costs rise nearly twice as fast as pay: 
survey

            The cost of health insurance in the United States climbed
nearly 
twice as fast as wages in the first half of 2007, with family coverage 
costing employers around 1,000 dollars (714 euros) a month, a poll showed 
Wednesday.

            Premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance rose an
average 
of 6.1 percent in 2007, while wages went up by 3.7 percent, the Employer 
Health Benefits Survey released by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the 
Health Research and Educational Trust showed.

            The 6.1 percent rise in health insurance premiums marked a 
slowdown from the rate of increase last year, but also strongly outpaced 
inflation, running at 2.6 percent.

            "In 2007, the increase in health insurance premiums was about 
twice the rate of inflation and not quite twice the increase in workers' 
pay," Kaiser vice-president Gary Claxton said in a webcast.

            Premiums for family coverage have surged by 78 percent since 
2001, while wages have gone up 19 percent.

            The average premium for family coverage in 2007 was just over 
12,000 dollars, with workers having to pick up part of the cost.

            Workers contributed, on average, 273 dollars a month towards 
family health coverage packages, up from 248 dollars last year, the
survey, 
which polled just over 3,000 public and private employers with three or
more 
workers during the first five months of 2007, showed.

            "Every year health insurance becomes less affordable for 
families and businesses. Over the past six years, the amount families pay 
out of pocket for their share of premiums has increased by about 1,500 
dollars," Drew Altman, chief executive of Kaiser, said in a statement.

            Employers in the United States offer health insurance packages

as a worker benefit.

            In 2007, 60 percent of US firms offered health benefits.

            That was down by nine percentage points on companies offering 
health care packages in 2000, the survey showed.

            Low-paid workers were found to have the fewest healthcare 
options, because the small firms they tend to work for are less likely to 
offer coverage.

            The high cost of premiums was cited as a main reason firms
fail 
to provide healthcare coverage to their employees.

            A survey released last month by the US Census Bureau showed
that 
47 million people had no health insurance in the United States last year,
up 
from 44.8 million in 2005.



            France is healthcare leader, US comes dead last: study
            Jan 8, 2008

            WA****NGTON (AFP) - France is tops, and the United States dead 
last, in providing timely and effective healthcare to its citizens, 
according to a survey Tuesday of preventable deaths in 19 industrialized 
countries.

            The study by the Commonwealth Fund and published in the 
January/February issue of the journal Health Affairs measured developed 
countries' effectiveness at providing timely and effective healthcare.

            The study, entitled "Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating

an Earlier Analysis," was written by researchers from the London School of

Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. It looked at death rates in subjects
younger 
than 75 that could have been prevented by timely and effective medical
care.

            The researchers found that while most countries surveyed saw 
preventable deaths decline by an average of 16 percent, the United States 
saw only a four percent dip.

            The non-profit Commonwealth Fund, which financed the study, 
expressed alarm at the findings.

            "It is startling to see the US falling even farther behind on 
this crucial indicator of health system performance," said Commonwealth
Fund 
Senior Vice President Cathy Schoen, who noted that "other countries are 
reducing these preventable deaths more rapidly, yet spending far less."

            The 19 countries, in order of best to worst, were: France, 
Japan, Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, 
Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, ****tugal, Spain, Sweden,

the United Kingdom and the United States.

            Some countries showed dramatic improvement in the periods 
studied -- 1997 and 1998 and again between 2002 and 2003 -- outpacing the 
United States, which showed only slight improvement.

            White the United States ranked 15th of 19 between 1997-98, by 
2002-03 it had fallen to last place.

            "It is notable that all countries have improved substantially 
except the US," said Ellen Nolte, lead author of the study.

            Had the United States performed as well as any of the top
three 
industrialized countries, there would have been 101,000 fewer deaths per 
year, the researchers said.
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
"aw" <awolf@  2008-05-12 14:56:43 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
kujebak <kujebak@[EMAI  2008-05-12 19:44:42 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
"aw" <awolf@  2008-05-12 20:21:28 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
Frank Bures <feeb@[EMA  2008-05-13 08:37:43 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
kujebak <kujebak@[EMAI  2008-05-12 21:08:07 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
"aw" <awolf@  2008-05-12 21:32:10 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
kujebak <kujebak@[EMAI  2008-05-12 21:43:24 
Re: Kujebak and the absence of any responses.
"aw" <awolf@  2008-05-12 22:16:23 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 16:46:56 CDT 2008.