[Followup-To: s.c.nordic and s.c.baltics]
James A. Donald kirjoitti:
> James A. Donald:
>>> Looking at a map of Europe, there is a striking
>>> correlation between how far nations went with the
>>> Swedish welfare state, and how close they were to
>>> the Soviet Union.
> Anton
>> France, Germany, Canada etc have similiar structures
>> in social politics.
> But your primary example is Sweden, which was close to
> the Soviet Union, was on the Baltic, and unlike Germany
> had a policy of supine defenselessness. Your best
> examples are baltic states, "Baltic", like "Finland",
> being a word that implies a policy of servility to the
> Soviet Union.
I exposed the weaknesses of your so called "theory" the previous post.
The fact that you snipped out the most essential parts, the ones
containing the most incriminating evidence against your theory, is a
sign of your admission of your defeat in the argument.
Anton wrote:
"Fear of the USSR made Finland mold society so that it resembles...
Sweden and Canada? You are not making much sense here."
"Real communist/far left societies like Cuba, North Korea, Angola etc
went a lot further in socialism and they are... close to the USSR? Sorry
James, but your theory of vicinity to USSR indicating any level of
socialism in society is not making much sense - as is the case with most
of your theories in this debate."
--
Anton
|
