Anton wrote:
> I believe the threshold for military action against Finland is
> significantly higher for a number of reasons:
> 1) Unlike Georgia or Ukraine Finland is also a member of the EU and
> never was a Soviet republic or Warsaw-pact satellite, hence we are not
> in their "sphere of interest" in a similar way, and in case of crisis
> odds are higher that EU would be forced to intervene if it wants to
> avoid to be seen as an organization that turns its back on it's members
> 2) Our military is significantly stronger than the Georgian army.
> 3) We also have very few residents here with a Russian pass****t. Most of
> our Russian speakers (50 000 or so) are descendants from old, pre-Soviet
> era, Russians or "Ingrian"=B9 returnees from late 1980s to present.
> 4) Much of Russia's im****ts go through Finland. The alternative routes
> are less appealing to them: Estonia or Poland.
> 5) Last but not least: we have no territorial claims or border disputes
> whatsoever.
LOL=B3. U forgot the most im****tant clause
0) Nobody gives a crap about your polar kingdom. Cuz it has neither
oil nor gas. Finnish vodka is not bad, but still not worth WW3.
