Eugene Holman wrote:
> MTRP=99 wrote:
> <deletions>
> > LOL=B3. U forgot the most im****tant clause
> > 0) Nobody gives a crap about your polar kingdom. Cuz it has neither
> > oil nor gas. Finnish vodka is not bad, but still not worth WW3.
> If global warming continues, Finland has lots of territory and few
> inhabitants. Flora and fauna typical of Central Europe have recently
begu=
n
> to show up here. Present climactic trends continuing, a century or two
> down the line Finland will have the climate that you now enjoy in
Germany=
,
> while the Mediterranean countries will be scorching hot, dry, and
> desertifying.
> Even without global warming, Finland has an increasngly valuable
resource=
:
> vast quantities of fresh water. When the oil runs out its vast forest
> reserves will also become much more valuable.
> Taking Finland is not worth WW3, but that's what they said, mutatus
> mutandis, when Archduke Franz Ferdinand got popped in Sarajevo. These
> things tend to get out of hand and escalate.
M=F6chte Zhenya seine Neue Heimat etwa appetitlich f=FCr den b=F6sen
B=E4re=
n
machen? Sorry, no chance yet. WW3 will be (actually is) about oil and
gas. But yes, it's only logical to expect that WW4 will be about
environment. And we learned that it will be fought with sticks and
stones, so Finland will have good chance to make profit, at least.
|
