Re: Anyone up for experimental collaboration?

On 22 Apr, 20:14, Blue Sow <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> FCS wrote:
> > On 22 Apr, 18:30, Blue Sow <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> FCS wrote:
>
> >>> COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON-SOW
> >>> --
> >> Corrected to:
> >> COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
> >> in respect of the text contributed by FCS.
>
> >> Text contributed by Blue Sow is not joint copyright with others, nor
is
> >> copyright claimed by Blue Sow in full or in part on text contributed
by others.
>
> >> But back to the plot - whose turn is it next?  Any takers?
>
> >> --
> >> Blue Sow
>
> > Hockay,
>
> > As you like.
>
> > Any other special considerations we should discuss at this point?
>
> > G DAEB
>
> > COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
> > --
>
> Only whose turn it is (-:
>
> Perhaps we could add a seance scene ... is there anyone theeeeeerrreee ?
>
> --
> Blue Sow- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, I read, wrote and posted. Is one post a week
per participant too many or too few? What I'd not
like to do is have us set a texture which can be
worked with then crash in with something which
takes it one way while someone else is thra****ng
out the nitty gritty of a contribution they've put time
and energy into and pull that rug from under them.

But as far as I'm concerned there's no reason not
to open it to anybody as blatant, timewasting, trolls
can be excised by way of picking it back up as a
new branch from the last worthwhile contribution.

Wouldn't some kind of a baddy though, surely, be
a pre-requisite to table turning...

G DAEB

COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
--