Re: Anyone up for experimental collaboration?

Mark Wallace wrote:
> "FCS" <sipston_777@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:1177209648.396636.171160@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> It occurred to me that having seen the list of
>> people who seconded the original newsgroup
>> request there are very few of them taking any
>> kind of active interest in it these days.
> 
> Being one of the "earlier incarnation", from when such initiatives were,
if 
> not commonplace, then at least not unusual: I'm in.
> 
> I'd contest your word limit, though.  If what needs to be said can be
said 
> in 25 words, then let it be so.
> 

Then let it be your move next  (-:


-- 
Blue Sow