Re: Anyone up for experimental collaboration?

On Apr 28, 10:36 pm, "Mark Wallace" <mwall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Blue Sow" <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:463139f4$0$21850$db0fefd9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark Wallace wrote:
> >> "FCS" <sipston_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>news:1177209648.396636.171160@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> It occurred to me that having seen the list of
> >>> people who seconded the original newsgroup
> >>> request there are very few of them taking any
> >>> kind of active interest in it these days.
>
> >> Being one of the "earlier incarnation", from when such initiatives
were,
> >> if not commonplace, then at least not unusual: I'm in.
>
> >> I'd contest your word limit, though.  If what needs to be said can be
> >> said in 25 words, then let it be so.
>
> > Then let it be your move next  (-:
>
> Fine.  Start things off (but let's avoid the Sigismund thing, eh?  It's
way
> too silly).
>
> It's your show, so hand out either a title or a 25-word-or-less
kick-off.
>
> The trickier the better.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

So what you're saying Mark is that most exam questions are too wordy
to be worth answering?

Most of the poetry on your site contains more than 25 words per
stanza.

Thus none of it was worth writing.

G DAEB

COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
--