Re: Anyone up for experimental collaboration?

I really can't be bothered to read your lengthy replies (the small fact
that 
you show a penchant to replying to things that I have not said has largely

contributed to this), so kindly stop posting multiple replies to what I 
post.

If you want to talk sense, I'll be happy to read it.  If you continue to 
make weird assumptions, and comment lengthily on them, I'll stop reading 
within a few sentences.  I have other things to do with my time.


"FCS" <sipston_777@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1178483130.829526.114970@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 6, 6:56 pm, "Mark Wallace" <mwall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> You really are a bore, do you know that?
>
> I get enough feedback round here to know
> that I get read. It did occur to me I hadn't
> made this clear.
>
> Some of them genuinely are tedious, creepy
> twats who're only out to take the piss. Others,
> actually, aren't.
>
> If you think about it, this means that you, too,
> have an audience. And boy do you look far
> more of a twat than I.
>
> Best of luck with your adolescent Lambton
> Worm fetish and cheap attempts at passive-
> agression.
>
> Is this the kind of response you can feel
> comfortable about not pretending you've
> not read?
>
> G DAEB
>
> COPYRIGHT (C) 2007 SIPSTON
> --
>