On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:32:37 +0100, "Pat Gardiner"
<patgardiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Old Codger" <oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:26pb045vlaffa754q7lh3hsif39rs010pr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:18:30 +0100, Julie <000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:38:49 +0100, Old Codger
>>><oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:51:46 +0100, "buddenbrooks"
>>>><nulled.address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Froot Bat" <oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4804ff02$0$13885$8a667849@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:21:54 +0100, Old Codger
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact there's nothing to stop him registering anyoldwhere.net and
>>>>>> suing you for using his name without permission and bringing it
into
>>>>>> disrepute by posting like a ****head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So one person forging anothers identity is OK but responding
>>>>> indicating
>>>>>the forgery is going to bring down the wrath of the legal system,
>>>>>pratt !
>>>>
>>>>Now now Hamish don't let everyone see what a cock you really are, you
>>>>have been hiding it so well lately with your various sock puppets.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It's a bit rich these dick head bullies using false names and emails
>>>complaining about people using false names and emails!
>>>
>>>Oh the irony LOL.
>>
>> I think it's lost on the twerps.
>>
>>>I say to the Codger kickng ass Go-Codge-Go.
>>
>> They used to like being the centre of attention, now all gone quiet. I
>> feel a football song coming on.
>
>Actually, I rather wish "Old Codger" would actually get round to removing
>much of the libelous mindless abuse that he was posting a year or so back
>under their encouragement. He was being used as a "patsy" of course and
was
>too dumb to see he was being used.
He's still too dumb to notice no one is talking to him LOL
>You can see the worst - he actually put my name in the headers.
>
>This is seriously interfering with my efforts to get Defra to test the
pigs
>for MRSA.
>
>When it later comes out that I was right about the pigs being sick since
>1999 and excessive antibiotics being used to get them into the food
chain,
>he is going to look really bad. I can see why he is sensitive about his
real
>identity.
One can see why he's ashamed to stand by his posts using his real
name.
>The failure of the NHS to test pig and ****k workers at the hospital door
may
>well have cost human lives.
>
>Deliberately spreading libel about a whistle-blower to undermine his
>credibility is not exactly a nice thing to do, when children and old
people
>die from MRSA.
Well we seem to have run the bullies out of town as far as UBA is
concerned.
>I have cut this back to uk.business.agriculture, otherwise those keen to
>continue the cover-up will... well you know the rest.
I've stuck them back in as I like to poke a troll.
|
