"CB" <CB@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:469b6b6f$0$32565$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "grinder" <seagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Qrwmi.7990$Od7.7060@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "CB" <CB@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:469a6a6d$0$30618$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "grinder" <seagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:wzsmi.7906$Od7.5807@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> "sdr" <sdrodrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:1184463200.693358.151820@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> What Atheists Can't Answer
>>>>> By Michael Gerson Friday, July 13, 2007;
>>>>> Page A17 Wa****ngton Post
>>>>>
>>>>> " Human nature, in other cir***stances, is also
>>>>> clearly constructed for cruel exploitation,
>>>>> uncontrollable rage, icy selfishness and a range of
>>>>> other less desirable traits.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the dilemma is this: How do we choose between
>>>>> good and bad instincts?
>>>>
>>>> A good instinct of mine is not to put my hand on a hot stove or step
in
>>>> front of a moving train. Yet for the life of me I don't remember
Jesus
>>>> ever telling me not to. Of course if I had not LEARNED that instinct
I
>>>> would either have a fried hand or not be writing this right now.
>>>>
>>>> Man-made religion had nothing to do with it.
>>>
>>> How do homo***ual men justify a lifestyle that reeks of feces?
>>>
>>
>> Why do you spend so much time thinking about it? And just how do you
>> know it reeks of feces? BTW, it is not limited to homo***ual men.
>>
>>> Common sence would tell ya its nasty butt it doesn't stop them.
>>>
>>
>> I wonder how many women say that about performing oral ***.
>>
>>> Does lust blind the morally weak to the point of indangering their
>>> health?
>>>
>>
>> Who said it is morally wrong? You? And who are you to say it is
morally
>> wrong? And if you bring up the bible include other offenses that are
>> considered morally wrong to the point of deserving exercution
including:
>>
>> cursing your parents,
>> committing adultary, and
>> working on the sabath among others.
>>
>> At least you proved one point of mine i.e. there is a positive
>> correlation between degree of religiosity and the tendency to hate.
>
> The act of Homo***uality is the sin. I'm not here to moralize the
virtues
> of the act, that's up to whom ever it applies to. That person will have
to
> answer to The 'Power' that be.
>
> For my self I know the moral implications of sin.
>
Yet you say you are not here to moralize. I don't even know if there is a
cure against moralizing which is a sickeness common to the American
Taliban.
And rest assured, neither you or me will be surprised the second after
death.
|
