CB wrote:
>
> "grinder" <seagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Qrwmi.7990$Od7.7060@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "CB" <CB@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:469a6a6d$0$30618$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> "grinder" <seagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:wzsmi.7906$Od7.5807@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> "sdr" <sdrodrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>> news:1184463200.693358.151820@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> What Atheists Can't Answer
> >>>> By Michael Gerson Friday, July 13, 2007;
> >>>> Page A17 Wa****ngton Post
> >>>>
> >>>> " Human nature, in other cir***stances, is also
> >>>> clearly constructed for cruel exploitation,
> >>>> uncontrollable rage, icy selfishness and a range of
> >>>> other less desirable traits.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the dilemma is this: How do we choose between
> >>>> good and bad instincts?
> >>>
> >>> A good instinct of mine is not to put my hand on a hot stove or step
in
> >>> front of a moving train. Yet for the life of me I don't remember
Jesus
> >>> ever telling me not to. Of course if I had not LEARNED that
instinct I
> >>> would either have a fried hand or not be writing this right now.
> >>>
> >>> Man-made religion had nothing to do with it.
> >>
> >> How do homo***ual men justify a lifestyle that reeks of feces?
> >>
> >
> > Why do you spend so much time thinking about it? And just how do you
> > know it reeks of feces? BTW, it is not limited to homo***ual men.
> >
> >> Common sence would tell ya its nasty butt it doesn't stop them.
> >>
> >
> > I wonder how many women say that about performing oral ***.
> >
> >> Does lust blind the morally weak to the point of indangering their
> >> health?
> >>
> >
> > Who said it is morally wrong? You? And who are you to say it is
morally
> > wrong? And if you bring up the bible include other offenses that are
> > considered morally wrong to the point of deserving exercution
including:
> >
> > cursing your parents,
> > committing adultary, and
> > working on the sabath among others.
> >
> > At least you proved one point of mine i.e. there is a positive
correlation
> > between degree of religiosity and the tendency to hate.
>
> The act of Homo***uality is the sin. I'm not here to moralize the
virtues of
> the act, that's up to whom ever it applies to. That person will have to
> answer to The 'Power' that be.
>
> For my self I know the moral implications of sin.
No superstition please.
RT
|
