Re: optimal vs. optimized [was: Re: string concatentation...]
by "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle_uk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Oct 14, 2007 at 03:35 PM
teachingvocabulary wrote:
>> Even though you are using the news client of the clueless,
>> groups.google.com, you can avoid being tarred with that brush if you
>> learn how to use it. One of the most im****tant is to snip away all
>> but those sections of the original post except those necessary and
>> germane to you response. Quoting the whole original post only to
>> add your own tiny bit to the end is unnecessary and, in fact, rude.
>
> Right. though that was not my point.
>
> I wanted to tell about teaching vocabulary. I teach vocabulary to
> students and take help of different sites. Some of them like
[...]
We disbelieve your claim. Your English isn't good enough to make you an
effective English teacher: you're just a low-down commercial spammer
breaking the charter of Usenet discussion groups. Anybody reading your
messages will avoid buying the stuff on principle: these things are
generally garbage anyhow.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com