Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > UK Language Culture English > Re: optimal vs....
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 825 of 944
Post > Topic >>

Re: optimal vs. optimized [was: Re: string concatentation...]

by "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle_uk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 14, 2007 at 03:35 PM

teachingvocabulary wrote:
>> Even though you are using the news client of the clueless,
>> groups.google.com, you can avoid being tarred with that brush if you
>> learn how to use it.  One of the most im****tant is to snip away all
>> but those sections of the original post except those necessary and
>> germane to you response.  Quoting the whole original post only to
>> add your own tiny bit to the end is unnecessary and, in fact, rude.
>
> Right. though that was not my point.
>
> I wanted to tell about teaching vocabulary. I teach vocabulary to
> students and take help of different sites. Some of them like
[...]

We disbelieve your claim. Your English isn't good enough to make you an
effective English teacher: you're just a low-down commercial spammer
breaking the charter of Usenet discussion groups. Anybody reading your
messages will avoid buying the stuff on principle: these things are
generally garbage anyhow.



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: optimal vs. optimized [was: Re: string concatentation...]
teachingvocabulary <te  2007-10-13 22:41:56 
Re: optimal vs. optimized [was: Re: string concatentation...]
"Mike Lyle" <  2007-10-14 15:35:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 21:33:53 CDT 2008.