Well, it's the quote below with the interesting reference to the Rolls
Royce models that I felt bears a trace of light hearted banter, Molly.
And I can swear, when I looked at it first, it came with a
'rider' (typed specially in a light pink box below the original
message) which stated for all those who cared to read, that the author
does not want this message archived and this message will disappear in
a span of exactly seven days! (After all, seven days was what it took
God Almighty to create the universe!)
But now, looking at it again, I find that this precautionary
notification has vanished in to thin air, much like the phantoms,
ghosts, elves,goblins et al in Uri's letter!
In all humility I retract from my earlier position that these things
don't really exist and are only figments of human imagination!
At 23:04:43 on Mon, 21 Jan 2008, ADPUF <flyhun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
<47951721$0$17945$4fafb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>The first two words were used to name Rolls Royce cars.
>There was also a Lotus Spirit, if I remember correctly.
Wasn't that a Lotus Sprite?
--
Molly Mockford
On 29 Jan, 00:53, Molly Mockford <nospamnob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> At 06:58:55 on Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Paul <paulmathew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> <5b7900aa-b9ad-42e7-a7c1-bdda0257c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
> >I wonder why Molly Mockford doesn't want her answer to be archived. It
> >is quite humorous and deserves to be archived, is my personal feeling.
>
> You've got the wrong person, I think - in normal newsgroup postings I
> have never used X-No-Archive, and never would - no more than I would
> conceal my real name. I stand by what I write, for good or ill, and I
> always have.
>
> [When I was a member of UKVoting, of course the Calls for Votes which I
> prepared included X-No-Archive headers, otherwise (*sigh*) users of
> GoogleGroups would find them and try to vote, months or even years after
> the vote had closed.]
>
> But thank you for the compliment, if it was indeed directed towards me,
> and not to somebody who is using XNA.
> --
> Molly Mockford
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little tem****ary
safety
> deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
> (My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
|
