by FCS <sipston_777@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 20, 2008 at 04:40 PM
On Jul 20, 10:16=A0pm, "John Briggs" <john.brig...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> John Hall wrote:
> > In article
> > <4b957484-5285-404b-8bfd-db08bb5ca...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > FCS <sipston_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >> The phenomena is not without parallel analogies.
> > <snip>
>
> > In any other group I'd hesitate to mention this, but that should be
> > "phenomenon". "Phenomena" is the plural.
>
> Absolutely - that's almost precisely why this group was formed :-)
"almost precisely"? Do you often post such effluded absolutes to
USENET?
> --
> John Briggs
G DAEB
COPYRIGHT (C) 2008 SIPSTON
