Lister <fache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:55:33 +0100, Andrew Halliwell
> <spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Scribbler <ngs_0501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Lister <fache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> news:2vssv31h4ugptdj55i23l1dg1kcv3pcnoi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Anyone interested in this NKOTB comeback then?
>>>>
>>>> No, thought not :)
>>>
>>> You're quite right! Not at all. I didn't even know they were coming
back.
>>
>>I asked lister 3 times on #speccy wtf he was on about with no reply.
>>Only now, when you've said "they" were coming back has it made the
>>connection.
>>
>
> Do you not see message headers in your news client?
>
>>When WAS the last time anyone even thought about nkotb? 1989? (apart
from
>>the odd reference like futurama that is)
>>
>>Besides, bit of a misnomer now isn't it?
>>Old middle aged gits on the block more like?
>
>
> Indeed :)
I see the im****tant ones, like "Subject" and "From", if I want to see
more,
I have to look... And I did look, and I don't see your point...
T'knob is even less meaningful than nkotb when you have no context, ffs.
So
what was the point of dragging headers into it?
--
| spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | "The day Microsoft makes something that
doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making
|
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge
|


|