On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:20:01 +0100, Andrew Halliwell
<spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Lister <fache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:55:33 +0100, Andrew Halliwell
>> <spike1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Scribbler <ngs_0501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Lister <fache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>> news:2vssv31h4ugptdj55i23l1dg1kcv3pcnoi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone interested in this NKOTB comeback then?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, thought not :)
>>>>
>>>> You're quite right! Not at all. I didn't even know they were coming
back.
>>>
>>>I asked lister 3 times on #speccy wtf he was on about with no reply.
>>>Only now, when you've said "they" were coming back has it made the
>>>connection.
>>>
>>
>> Do you not see message headers in your news client?
>>
>>>When WAS the last time anyone even thought about nkotb? 1989? (apart
from
>>>the odd reference like futurama that is)
>>>
>>>Besides, bit of a misnomer now isn't it?
>>>Old middle aged gits on the block more like?
>>
>>
>> Indeed :)
>
>I see the im****tant ones, like "Subject" and "From", if I want to see
more,
>I have to look... And I did look, and I don't see your point...
>
>T'knob is even less meaningful than nkotb when you have no context, ffs.
So
>what was the point of dragging headers into it?
I believe it was Scrib that coined T'knob, so don't go blaming me :)
|
